2005
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single agent rituximab in patients with follicular or mantle cell lymphoma: clinical and biological factors that are predictive of response and event-free survival as well as the effect of rituximab on the immune system: a study of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

Abstract: We defined the characteristics predicting response and EFS to rituximab. Prolonged treatment results in longer EFS at the cost of a longer reduction in B cell and IgM levels, but without additional clinical toxicity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
110
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
110
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bargou et al (2008) showed the safety of a BiTE antibody, blinatumomab (a BiTE with dual specificity for CD19 and CD3), in their clinical trial, and confirmed that responses to blinatumomab as a single agent occurred in B-cell lymphoma patients at a serum level of 0.6 ng ml À1 . This is about five orders of magnitude below serum levels reported for the monoclonal antibody rituximab at standard doses, which similarly elicits objective responses as a single agent in this disease (Hainsworth et al, 2003;Ghielmini et al, 2005). The enormous potency difference between the BiTE blinatumomab and a conventional antibody could be explained by a greater number of T cells attacking an individual tumour cell (both due to more T cells that are able to recognise tumour and Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Bargou et al (2008) showed the safety of a BiTE antibody, blinatumomab (a BiTE with dual specificity for CD19 and CD3), in their clinical trial, and confirmed that responses to blinatumomab as a single agent occurred in B-cell lymphoma patients at a serum level of 0.6 ng ml À1 . This is about five orders of magnitude below serum levels reported for the monoclonal antibody rituximab at standard doses, which similarly elicits objective responses as a single agent in this disease (Hainsworth et al, 2003;Ghielmini et al, 2005). The enormous potency difference between the BiTE blinatumomab and a conventional antibody could be explained by a greater number of T cells attacking an individual tumour cell (both due to more T cells that are able to recognise tumour and Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…4 The importance of ADCC in rituximab efficacy is supported by 4 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) trials in which patients bearing the Fc␥RIIA-H131R and Fc␥RIIIA-V158F highaffinity Fc␥R polymorphisms exhibited improved response to rituximab therapy. [5][6][7][8][9] Whereas in vitro studies demonstrate rituximab can mediate ADCC against primary CLL cells, 2,10 one preliminary study did not identify correlation of response with high-affinity Fc␥R polymorphisms. 11 This has prompted investigation of innate immune enhancing agents to improve both ADCC and rituximab efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ocaratuzumab induced similar ADCC to obinutuzumab at all E:T ratios tested (all P > 0. 20). These data have effectively demonstrated that in CLL cells Fc-engineered ocaratuzumab mediates superior allogeneic ADCC when compared with the non-Fc-engineered ofatumumab or rituximab at both lower antibody concentrations and smaller E:T ratios.…”
Section: Antibody-dependent Cellular Phagocytosismentioning
confidence: 89%