2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2565(04)71386-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Síncope: ¿muchos estudios y pocos diagnósticos?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, distinction between cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic type is the crucial step in the management of such patients. The sharp difference in prognosis between these aetiologies, often leads to an excess of needless tests [3]. The most important tool for diagnosis of syncope remains a good clinical historytaking and EKG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, distinction between cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic type is the crucial step in the management of such patients. The sharp difference in prognosis between these aetiologies, often leads to an excess of needless tests [3]. The most important tool for diagnosis of syncope remains a good clinical historytaking and EKG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Está producido por una hipoperfusión cerebral global transitoria (1,2). y aunque es muy frecuente en la clínica diaria, su diagnóstico etiológico en muchos casos puede ser difícil, incluso tras exhaustivos estudios hospitalarios (3,4).…”
unclassified