2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-012-1669-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sinapic acid derivatives in defatted Oriental mustard (Brassica juncea L.) seed meal extracts using UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS n and identification of compounds with antibacterial activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
81
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are similar to those of this study, although the MIC of sinapic acid against E. coli were different. Engels and others () observed that the inhibitory effects of sinapic acid was strong in the order of L. monocytogenes (MIC, 0.2 g/L) > S. aureus, B. subtilis, L. innocua (0.3 g/L) > P. fluorescens (0.6 g/L) > E. coli (0.7 g/L), which are similar results to those of this study in terms of relative antibacterial activity against each bacterial strain. On the other hand, the MIC of sinapic acid against L. plantarum was found to be greater than 0.7 g/L, indicating the antibacterial activity of sinapic acid is remarkably selective (Engels and others ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are similar to those of this study, although the MIC of sinapic acid against E. coli were different. Engels and others () observed that the inhibitory effects of sinapic acid was strong in the order of L. monocytogenes (MIC, 0.2 g/L) > S. aureus, B. subtilis, L. innocua (0.3 g/L) > P. fluorescens (0.6 g/L) > E. coli (0.7 g/L), which are similar results to those of this study in terms of relative antibacterial activity against each bacterial strain. On the other hand, the MIC of sinapic acid against L. plantarum was found to be greater than 0.7 g/L, indicating the antibacterial activity of sinapic acid is remarkably selective (Engels and others ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Engels and others () observed that the inhibitory effects of sinapic acid was strong in the order of L. monocytogenes (MIC, 0.2 g/L) > S. aureus, B. subtilis, L. innocua (0.3 g/L) > P. fluorescens (0.6 g/L) > E. coli (0.7 g/L), which are similar results to those of this study in terms of relative antibacterial activity against each bacterial strain. On the other hand, the MIC of sinapic acid against L. plantarum was found to be greater than 0.7 g/L, indicating the antibacterial activity of sinapic acid is remarkably selective (Engels and others ). Sinapic acid, a type of phenolic acid, is a weak acid that diffuses across microbial cell membranes as an undissociated acid, causing acidification of the cytoplasm and eventually cell death (Sánchez‐Maldonado and others ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2.6–5.0 mg/g expressed as the sinapic acid equivalent. Also several new compounds (kaempferol‐sinapoyl‐trihexoside, sinapoyl‐hexoside, disinapoyl‐dihexoside, disinapoyl‐hexoside, and sinapoyl conjugates) were found by Engels et al during their studies on antimicrobial properties of sinapic acid derivatives present in seeds of mustard ( Brassica juncea L.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Actually, camalexin disrupts cell membrane of bacterial and fungal pathogens 24 . However, phenolic compounds like sinapic, phytic acids and derivatives of flavonols (qucercetin) have been considered as potent antioxidant with antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties by many workers 14,25,26 . It is speculated that the mechanism of flavonoid antimicrobial activity is due to their ability to inhibition of microbial adhesion and inactivation of cell envelope transport proteins 14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%