2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous whole-body 18 F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 The recent introduction of integrated PET/MRI systems enables now a simultaneous high-quality assessment of the local tumor extent and metastatic spread, by combining the diagnostic advantages of MRI and PET. 16,17 Accordingly, the aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of integrated PET/MRI of the breast for local tumor and nodal staging of patients with primary breast cancer in comparison to PET/CT and MRI. Furthermore, we investigated whether PET/MRI might improve diagnostic accuracy for the identification and characterization of primary breast tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 The recent introduction of integrated PET/MRI systems enables now a simultaneous high-quality assessment of the local tumor extent and metastatic spread, by combining the diagnostic advantages of MRI and PET. 16,17 Accordingly, the aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of integrated PET/MRI of the breast for local tumor and nodal staging of patients with primary breast cancer in comparison to PET/CT and MRI. Furthermore, we investigated whether PET/MRI might improve diagnostic accuracy for the identification and characterization of primary breast tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to our results, PET shows best results for axillary lymph node staging. On the contrary, Taneja and colleagues showed a lower sensitivity on PET (60%) than on MRI (93.3%) for detection of axillary lymph nodes with PET/MRI [27]. A possible explanation for the lower PET detection rate is that PET/ MRI scans in the study of Taneja might have been made during NAC treatment (this was not specified).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…So far, only very few studies based on relatively small sample sizes have addressed the clinical workflow, feasibility, and optimized PET/MRI protocols in oncology [76]- [78]. Although some authors report no added diagnostic benefit in comparison with PET/CT or MRI [76], [79], [80], [81], others describe added value in selected cases [82]- [84]. During the past two years, there has been only a slow increase in the rate of new PET/MRI system installations, mainly owing to lack of clearly defined applications, and currently, there is little evidence to validate key applications based on the experience of multiple centers.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Pet/mrimentioning
confidence: 96%