1997
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199703273361304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hepatitis C Virus from a Needle-Stick Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
1
10

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
69
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…for the breakthrough animal, even in ILN specimens on the final day of PMPA therapy, is intriguing and perhaps indicates the presence of an early low-level infection, possibly localized to the site of exposure. The observation of this delayed infection in our model (ϳ3 months later than in untreated controls) and recent human evidence (21) further support the need for adequate follow-up periods after PEP administration to monitor for delayed seroconversions.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…for the breakthrough animal, even in ILN specimens on the final day of PMPA therapy, is intriguing and perhaps indicates the presence of an early low-level infection, possibly localized to the site of exposure. The observation of this delayed infection in our model (ϳ3 months later than in untreated controls) and recent human evidence (21) further support the need for adequate follow-up periods after PEP administration to monitor for delayed seroconversions.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Rapid progression to cirrhosis, within 2 years, has also been reported with simultaneous HIV/HCV co-infection following a needle stick injury. 16 Such a rapid progression is similar to that seen in hypogammaglobulinaemic patients.…”
Section: Hiv Co-infectionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In another case, an apheresis machine spilled a large amount of blood on a healthcare worker's arms and hands, and blood may have contacted an area of dermatitis on the ear. 30 Splatters from blood-collection tubes accounted for three mucocutaneous exposures: one to a healthcare worker's face and mouth 30 ; one to a healthcare worker's hand, whose skin was described as chapped with cuts and open cracks 31 ; and one to another healthcare worker's hand, where the glass fragments from the broken blood-collection tube also caused a percutaneous injury. Blood splashed another healthcare worker in the eye and on an upper extremity, which was abraded during a struggle to restrain a combative patient.…”
Section: Mucocutaneous Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%