2006
DOI: 10.1108/02644400610680351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous topology and size optimization of structures by genetic algorithm using minimal length chromosome

Abstract: PurposeLayout optimization of structures aims to find the optimal topology and member sizes in an integrated manner. For this purpose, the most successful attempts have addressed the outstanding features of the genetic algorithms.Design/methodology/approachThis paper utilizes a direct index coding (DIC) in a way that the optimization algorithm can simultaneously integrate topology and size in a minimal length chromosome in order to seek the true optimum in an efficient and reasonable manner. Proper genetic ope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first attempt, two-point crossover and a population of size 40 were employed. Both these first and second sample runs resulted in the global optimum mentioned in the literature [20] (Table III), but it took less computational effort for the proposed method of DSP as indicated in Table IV. For the second attempt, uniform crossover and a smaller population size were applied to a randomly generated set of individuals as initial population.…”
Section: Layout Optimization For the 6-node Planar Trussmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the first attempt, two-point crossover and a population of size 40 were employed. Both these first and second sample runs resulted in the global optimum mentioned in the literature [20] (Table III), but it took less computational effort for the proposed method of DSP as indicated in Table IV. For the second attempt, uniform crossover and a smaller population size were applied to a randomly generated set of individuals as initial population.…”
Section: Layout Optimization For the 6-node Planar Trussmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As a benchmark example, the well-known 6-node truss of Figure 1 is treated here [20,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Material properties are taken as E = 68.95 GN/m 2 , = 27.1 kN/m 3 , allowable axial stress is a = ± 172 MN/m 2 and nodal displacements are confined to | a,y | 0.0508 m. In this example, optimal integrated topology and size is searched provided that each of P 1 and P 2 is applied as a separate loading condition [43].…”
Section: Layout Optimization For the 6-node Planar Trussmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now it is able to lay them based on the computerized three-dimensional surface model. The optimum (Guo et al, 2003;Yu et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2007;Kaveh and Shahrouzi, 2006;Pugsley et al, 2006) layout design of the rectangular tiles is necessary because it influences the layout quality denoted by the deformation of them and the layout workload denoted by the number of fixing bolts and the amount of stuffing. Therefore, they could impact the ship construction period and costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kaveh y Shahrouzi [198] emplearon un Algoritmo Genético binario donde utilizaron una codificación indexada mediante una tabla de correspondencias en lugar de la tradicional codificación binaria, obteniendo un comportamiento más eficiente del algoritmo comparado con una codificación binaria tradicional. Aplicaron el algoritmo a la clásica estructura de diez barras, con un resultado aceptable, así como a la también clásica estructura de 25 barras.…”
Section: Canyurt Y Hajela [55] Utilizaron Un Autómata Celular Basado unclassified