2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous species identification and detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci using triplex real-time PCR assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the newer assays, although sensitive and specific, require complicated procedures for processing or detection (14) or are not commercially available (37). Those that are available commercially do not discriminate between MSSA and MRSA (16,22) or require a subcultured isolate (18,33), which is the aforementioned time constraint with culture-based methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the newer assays, although sensitive and specific, require complicated procedures for processing or detection (14) or are not commercially available (37). Those that are available commercially do not discriminate between MSSA and MRSA (16,22) or require a subcultured isolate (18,33), which is the aforementioned time constraint with culture-based methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleic acid amplification methods can provide same-day results once the blood cultures are positive for microbial growth; however, the majority of presently described assays are not designed to differentiate between MSSA and MRSA. Additionally, those nucleic acid amplification procedures that can differentiate between MSSA and MRSA often require labor-intensive protocols, technologically advanced equipment, and a colony isolated from subculture, or such assays are not readily available (14,17,28,30,33,37,42). The detection of mecA or MRSA in positive blood culture bottles using molecular methods has previously been very successful (4,36), but there are few reports on the rapid differentiation between MSSA and MRSA among other gram-positive organisms causing bacteremia (29,34,37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant target was nuc gene used in either conventional PCR (Ercolini et al 2004;Pinto et al 2005;Ikeda et al 2005;Cremonesi et al 2005) or quantitative real-time PCR (Hein et al 2005;Alarcon et al 2006). Other popular targets were species-specific regions of the DNA coding for 16S or 23S rRNA or coa gene (Cremonesi et al 2005;Baron et al 2004;Sabet et al 2006) and putative transcriptional regulator genes (Liu et al 2005;Goto et al 2007). These S.-aureus-specific genes were successfully amplified along with se (ent) genes coding for enterotoxins in multiplex conventional PCR (Ercolini et al 2004;Pinto et al 2005;Ikeda et al 2005;Tamarapu et al 2001;Cremonesi et al 2007) or at simultaneous species identification and detection of methicillin resistance using multiplex real-time PCR assay (Baron et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this type of PCR assay still quite laborious and time-consuming since it requires the preparation and PCR product characterization using gel electrophoresis (Costa et al 2005;Kearns et al 1999). Recently, a number of real-time PCR studies based on fluorescent probes have been carried out to detect MRSA from various clinical sources using TaqMan probes (Sabet et al 2006(Sabet et al , 2007Costa et al 2005). However, these assays require the availability of primers and probes that must be selected according to very rigid conditions, which cannot always be easily applied (Nam et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%