2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33676-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Semantic Segmentation and Outlier Detection in Presence of Domain Shift

Abstract: Recent success on realistic road driving datasets has increased interest in exploring robust performance in real-world applications. One of the major unsolved problems is to identify image content which can not be reliably recognized with a given inference engine. We therefore study approaches to recover a dense outlier map alongside the primary task with a single forward pass, by relying on shared convolutional features. We consider semantic segmentation as the primary task and perform extensive validation on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing works that model uncertainty in semantic segmentation [1,21] are evaluated only with IoU, which does not assess the predicted confidence. In contrast, for uncertainty-aware semantic segmentation, algorithms are required to output both a hard semantic prediction Ĥ and a confidence map C with values in the range [0, 1].…”
Section: Uncertainty-aware Semantic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing works that model uncertainty in semantic segmentation [1,21] are evaluated only with IoU, which does not assess the predicted confidence. In contrast, for uncertainty-aware semantic segmentation, algorithms are required to output both a hard semantic prediction Ĥ and a confidence map C with values in the range [0, 1].…”
Section: Uncertainty-aware Semantic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also trained [1] on ACDC, using the GT invalid masks for training its outlier detection part. The learned confidence by [1] leads to lower test set AUIoU (52.0%) than constant confidence (53.0%), indicating that a better modeling of uncertainty is needed in future approaches.…”
Section: Baselines and Oraclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we introduce UIoU, a new semantic segmentation metric that handles images with regions of uncertain semantic content and is suited for adverse conditions. Our uncertainty-aware evaluation is complementary to uncertaintyaware methods such as [56] and [57] that explicitly incorporate uncertainty in their model formulation and aims to promote the development of such methods, as UIoU rewards models that accurately capture heteroscedastic aleatoric uncertainty [56] in the input images through the different treatment of invalid and valid regions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that on Dark Zurich-test, these models generally have lower confidence on invalid regions than valid ones, although they do not explicitly model uncertainty, as there is no distinction between valid and invalid regions during training. Modeling confidence explicitly along the lines of [56], [57] could further increase UIoU and is an interesting direction for future work. Second, the comparative performance of the methods is the same across all values of θ, except the pair of MGCDA and GCMA.…”
Section: Comparisons With Uioumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zendel et al [64] propose a semantic segmentation dataset for checking the confidence score of DNNs. The authors of [3] train a DNN to predict OOD confidence score. Lee et al [36] train a GAN along with the classifier to produce near-distribution examples and enforce lower classifier confidence on GAN samples.…”
Section: Bayesian Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%