2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous removal of tetrathionate and copper from simulated acidic mining water in bioelectrochemical and electrochemical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, this process is direct electrochemical reduction of metal ions adsorbed on an electrode surface. Electrodeposition can effectively handle both copper and arsenic wastes, often with the production of pure elemental copper depending on the electrochemical parameters. , This method has also been used for secondary recovery of residual copper from low-content tailings derived from waste electrical cable . These applications of electrodeposition rely on the same principle of removing metal ions from aqueous solutions that is used to charge aqueous metal flow batteries, such as zinc–air, zinc–bromine, zinc–iron, and lithium–air batteries …”
Section: Electrochemical Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, this process is direct electrochemical reduction of metal ions adsorbed on an electrode surface. Electrodeposition can effectively handle both copper and arsenic wastes, often with the production of pure elemental copper depending on the electrochemical parameters. , This method has also been used for secondary recovery of residual copper from low-content tailings derived from waste electrical cable . These applications of electrodeposition rely on the same principle of removing metal ions from aqueous solutions that is used to charge aqueous metal flow batteries, such as zinc–air, zinc–bromine, zinc–iron, and lithium–air batteries …”
Section: Electrochemical Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the high toxicity response factor of copper (TR = 5) for different water bodies, we have to obtain an effluent with discharge concentrations lower than MCL to effectively avoid possible health risks. Cellulose acetate based biopolymeric mixed matrix membranes 84-88% [141] Chitosan-cellulose acetate-TiO 2 based membrane 97% [142] Ion exchange Y zeolite ion exchangers 64% [143] Ion exchange resin 99.14% [144] Electrochemical reaction Bipolar disc reactor 90.1% [145] Continuous electrochemical cell 91% [146] Bioelectrochemical and electrochemical systems 99.9% [147] Chemical precipitation OM in waste distillery slops-precipitation/coagulation 92% [148] Synthetic nesquehonite 99.97% [149] struvite 99.9% [150] Adsorption Hexagonal boron nitride 92% [151] Zeolite, bentonite, and steel slag 98.47-99.98% [152] Agro-industrial waste 89% [153] Biotechnology Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 88% [154] Microalgae >95% [155] Aspergillus australensis Biomass 79% [156] Table 3. Summary of different copper ion removal technologies [3,157,158].…”
Section: Conclusion and Outlooks For Cu(ii) Removal And Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current can be used at the cathode to reduce, e.g., metal ions to solid metal species. Biological oxidation of either acetate (Rodenas Motos et al 2015) or tetrathionate (Sulonen et al 2018) has been coupled to Cu recovery in laboratory-scale MFCs. Furthermore, an MFC coupling acetate oxidation to Cu recovery was scaled-up to bio-anode and cathode surface areas of 835 cm 2 and 700 cm 2 , respectively (Rodenas Motos et al 2017).…”
Section: Technologies and Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%