Simultaneous removal of sulfate and arsenic using immobilized non-traditional SRB mixed culture and alternative low-cost carbon sources

Matos, Letícia Paiva de; Costa, Patrícia Freitas; Moreira, Mariana; Gomes, Paula Cristine Silva; Silva, Silvana de Queiroz; Gurgel, Leandro Vinícius Alves; Teixeira, Mônica Cristina

doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.035

Cited by 44 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Experimental design is detailed in Matos et al [1] . All experiments and analyses were replicated twice and data were averaged.…”

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A microbial culture was obtained after enrichment of some sediment samples, collected from an urban pond, using modified Postgate C liquid medium [1] , [2] . Microbial culture was adapted to acidic pH (5–5.5) and to the use of Glycerol as electron donor.…”

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Microbial culture was adapted to acidic pH (5–5.5) and to the use of Glycerol as electron donor. Main identified microbial species were Pantoea agglomerans , Enterobacter sp, Citrobacter sp ; Cupriavidus metallidurans , Ralstonia sp and Burkholderia cepacia [1] . Microbial mixed culture was considered as a non-traditional sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) consortium.…”

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Both, batch and semi-continuous experiments were conducted using free and calcium alginate encapsulated microbial cells [1] . Postgate C liquid medium, at pH 5.5 was enriched with sodium lactate, glycerol and PCF as carbon sources.…”

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Data format Analyzed. Averaged data Experimental factors Brief description of any pretreatment of samples Experimental features Culture media was prepared as previously described [1] , [3] and incubated in an oven (Fanem, model A-LT). Samples were centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 15 min, Fiberlite F155-8×50cy, Thermo, Multifuge X1R) and filtered (0.45 μm acetate cellulose membrane - Sartorius-Stedium) and acidified with nitric acid (50 μL) before residual As(III) measurements.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Data set on the bioprecipitation of sulfate and trivalent arsenic by acidophilic non-traditional sulfur reducing bacteria

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Data presented here are related to the original paper “Simultaneous removal of sulfate and arsenic using immobilized non-traditional sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) mixed culture and alternative low-cost carbon sources” published by same authors (Matos et al., 2018) [1]. The data set here presented aims to facilitate this paper comprehension by giving readers some additional information. Data set includes a brief description of experimental conditions and the results obtained during both batch and semi-continuous reactors experiments. Data confirmed arsenic and sulfate were simultaneously removed under acidic pH by using a biological treatment based on the activity of a non-traditional sulfur reducing bacteria consortium. This microbial consortium was able to utilize glycerol, powdered chicken feathers as carbon donors, and proved to be resistant to arsenite up to 8.0 mg L−1. Data related to sulfate and arsenic removal efficiencies, residual arsenite and sulfate contents, pH and Eh measurements obtained under different experimental conditions were depicted in graphical format.Refers to https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.035

show abstract

“…Experimental design is detailed in Matos et al [1] . All experiments and analyses were replicated twice and data were averaged.…”

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%