2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous removal of SO2 and NO using a spray dryer absorption (SDA) method combined with O3 oxidation for sintering/pelleting flue gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NO concentration in industrial sinter flue gas is often variable due to the uneven distribution of fossil-fuel nitrogen and incomplete combustion [51]. The different sinter raw mix and ratio also affect NO emission [52]. Herein, the influence of NO initial concentration on NOx removal was investigated, and the results are shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Investigation Of No Initial Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NO concentration in industrial sinter flue gas is often variable due to the uneven distribution of fossil-fuel nitrogen and incomplete combustion [51]. The different sinter raw mix and ratio also affect NO emission [52]. Herein, the influence of NO initial concentration on NOx removal was investigated, and the results are shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Investigation Of No Initial Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, de-NOx was unaffected by the concentration of NaOH, and because the SO concentration of 1.0% was sufficient for NOx removal, the removal efficiency was 574% regardless of the concentration of NaOH. When there is little to no SO in the spray liquid, the lack of NaOH leads to SO2 dissolving in water to become HSO , and the reaction of NO2 and HSO converts NO2 to NO (Cai et al, 2020). Because of this, de-NOx does not decrease significantly, even when there is a lack of sulfite.…”
Section: Effect Of Naoh Concentration and Concentration On Simultaneomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, WFGD generates a large amount of desulfurization wastewater, the treatment of which involves the use of complex equipment and high economic cost [3]. Compared to WFGD, the SDA and DSI techniques have lower energy consumption and better fuel economy [4]. The desulfurization efficiency of the SDA technique has reached more than 90 %, there are no scaling and corrosion problems, and the water consumption is relatively low, requiring less space [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%