2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra01740a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous reinforcement and toughness improvement of an epoxy–phenolic network with a hyperbranched polysiloxane modifier

Abstract: An epoxy-phenolic network is modified with hyperbranched polysiloxane (HBPSi). The addition of HBPSi-2, which has medium molecular weight, can significantly decrease the viscosity of the uncured epoxyphenolic system and increase the crosslinking density and homogeneity of the cured crosslinking network. With 10% HBPSi-2, the mechanical properties of the samples are improved comprehensively: tensile modulus and maximum strength increase by 11.4% and 36.2%, respectively, while elongation at break and impact stre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This same feature, in the cured state, makes the central aryl ring sterically hindered due to the absence of an axis of symmetry which prevents the chain segments from readily undergoing motions in the glassy state . These results suggest that the α transition is more dependent on the molecular structure of the polymer chain elements than overall network architecture effects such as cross‐link density and molecular weight between crosslinks . Interestingly, the BGOBP‐BisF blended resins exhibited a lower α rubbery, while exhibiting a high α glassy , indicating greater molecular mobility in the glassy state, yet less mobility in the rubbery state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This same feature, in the cured state, makes the central aryl ring sterically hindered due to the absence of an axis of symmetry which prevents the chain segments from readily undergoing motions in the glassy state . These results suggest that the α transition is more dependent on the molecular structure of the polymer chain elements than overall network architecture effects such as cross‐link density and molecular weight between crosslinks . Interestingly, the BGOBP‐BisF blended resins exhibited a lower α rubbery, while exhibiting a high α glassy , indicating greater molecular mobility in the glassy state, yet less mobility in the rubbery state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The entire tan δ peak of the cured resins represents the glass transition step which involves multiple molecular motions within the network that become thermodynamically favorable as temperature increases . As a result, the peak breadth and height of the tan δ curve provides an insight into the network mobility . The tan δ curve for the BisF‐based networks appears sharper (narrow and more intense peak) when compared to the BGOPpX‐ and BGOPmX‐based networks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be produced by an increased propensity for higher levels of side reactions such as internal cyclisation or etherification during the diffusion controlled regime of cure for the TGAPB networks. [ 15,22 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be produced by an increased propensity for higher levels of side reactions such as internal cyclisation or etherification during the diffusion controlled regime of cure for the TGAPB networks. [15,22] Furthermore, symmetrical epoxies, those with an allpara backbone have an axis of rotation for each aryl ring which allows them to undergo aromatic ring flips at elevated temperature or during stress under load, unlike asymmetric epoxy resins. The availability of these additional molecular motions increases the distribution of molecular conformations across different length scales resulting in broader but less intense peaks in the tan δ thermogram as is observed here.…”
Section: Glass Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being primarily controlled by crosslink density or the chemical structure of the network, additive approaches to improving toughness are common, including ductile and rigid inclusions, interlayers, and nanoadditives to name a few. The primary goal of all these strategies, however, remains the enhancement of toughness or distortional behavior, without compromising other desirable properties such as modulus, strength, or processability …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%