2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous quantification of 8-iso-prostaglandin-F2α and 11-dehydro thromboxane B2 in human urine by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It involves the efficiency of the extraction procedure and is determined by spiking the baseline urine samples with known amounts of standards. The recovery was calculated as previously described . The ratio '[(final concentration – initial concentration)/added concentration]' was determined for three different concentrations between the lower and upper limits of the previously estimated linear range of the standards (0.2, 150, and 330 ng mL –1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It involves the efficiency of the extraction procedure and is determined by spiking the baseline urine samples with known amounts of standards. The recovery was calculated as previously described . The ratio '[(final concentration – initial concentration)/added concentration]' was determined for three different concentrations between the lower and upper limits of the previously estimated linear range of the standards (0.2, 150, and 330 ng mL –1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). The use of the Strata X‐AW, C18 Sep‐Pak, and Oasis‐HLB cartridges followed the protocols described by Taylor et al ., Cavalca et al ., and Zhang et al ., respectively. The eluted compounds were dried completely using a SpeedVac concentrator (Savant SPD121P, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It involves the efficiency of the extraction procedure and is determined by spiking known amounts of standards to the baseline urine samples. Recovery was calculated as previously described (Cavalca et al, 2010;Medina et al, 2012). The ratio '[(final concentration À initial concentration)/added concentration]' was determined in two different levels of concentrations (15-16 ng/mL and 30-32 ng/mL depending on the metabolite) between the lower and upper limits of the previously estimation of the standards linearity.…”
Section: Validation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8-Iso-PGF 2 α determination was performed by modifying a previously described LC-MS/MS method [24]. Briefly, the chromatographic separation was performed using an XBridge® C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, particle size 3.5  μ m; Waters Milford, MA, USA) maintained at 30°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%