1999
DOI: 10.1080/00032719908542954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Polarographic Determination of Lead (II) and TIN (II) by Multivariate Calibration

Abstract: The polarographic waves of lead (II) and tin (II) overlap due to their similar reductive potentials and it is difficult to determine these two components simultaneously without a pre-separation. In this paper, differential pulse polarography (DPP) combined with multivariate calibration approaches, such as classical least squares (CLS), principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares (PLS), were successfully applied to the resolution of overlapping polarographic waves of these two components in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, new solutions are constantly being sought to eliminate mercury-based electrodes [70,71]. Mercury electrodes used for trace tin determination include static mercury drop electrode (SMDE) [47][48][49], dropping mercury electrode (DME) [50][51][52], hanging mercury drop electrode (HMDE) [20][21][22][23][34][35][36][37][38][39]51,52], and mercury film electrode (MFE) [40,41]. As you can see, the determination of tin by adsorptive stripping voltammetry has most commonly been carried out using HMDE as the working electrode.…”
Section: Working Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, new solutions are constantly being sought to eliminate mercury-based electrodes [70,71]. Mercury electrodes used for trace tin determination include static mercury drop electrode (SMDE) [47][48][49], dropping mercury electrode (DME) [50][51][52], hanging mercury drop electrode (HMDE) [20][21][22][23][34][35][36][37][38][39]51,52], and mercury film electrode (MFE) [40,41]. As you can see, the determination of tin by adsorptive stripping voltammetry has most commonly been carried out using HMDE as the working electrode.…”
Section: Working Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suitable electrolyte compositions for electroanalytical methods result in low detection limits and wide ranges of linearity for the method. The most commonly used supporting electrolytes in electrochemical methods have been acetate buffer [24,26,28,29,34,36,[38][39][40][41][42], borate buffer [31], formate buffer [37], hydrochloric acid [30,32,48,[55][56][57], oxalic acid [51], sodium bromide [25], and sodium chloride [33]. For voltammetric methods, acetate buffer was the most commonly used supporting electrolyte [24,26,28,29,34,36,[38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Supporting Electrolyte and Complexing Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…19 The NAS calculations are used both for estimation of the figures of merit of an analytical method and its performance including limit of detection, sensitivity and selectivity for each component 26 and for the construction of multivariate calibration models. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] There are some reports on voltammetric determination of lead and tin by chemometrics methods 12,[27][28][29] and in this paper we develop a simple and new chemometrics method based on differential pulse polarography for simultaneous determination of Sn 2+ and Pb 2+ . With the DPP extremely overlapped peaks was obtained so they was determined by new method called net analyte signal standard addition method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%