2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous nitrification–denitrification and phosphorus removal in a fixed bed sequencing batch reactor (FBSBR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
39
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that high DO concentration favors conditions for niftrifier bacteria to oxidize the ammonium and improve the removal percentages of TN and NH 4 + -N. However, decreasing aeration rate caused high dissolved organic carbon concentrations, which inhibited nitrification both in the anoxic and oxic zones and thereby increased the concentration of nitrogen in the effluent. Similar results were reported by [3], [22], [23].…”
Section: Effect Of Aeration Rate On Simultaneous Nitrification and Desupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results indicate that high DO concentration favors conditions for niftrifier bacteria to oxidize the ammonium and improve the removal percentages of TN and NH 4 + -N. However, decreasing aeration rate caused high dissolved organic carbon concentrations, which inhibited nitrification both in the anoxic and oxic zones and thereby increased the concentration of nitrogen in the effluent. Similar results were reported by [3], [22], [23].…”
Section: Effect Of Aeration Rate On Simultaneous Nitrification and Desupporting
confidence: 91%
“…EBPR has been reported in fixed-carrier sequencing batch biofilm reactors on a number of occasions, although observed removal rates have been variable, a >90% Total P-removal rate was reported at lab scale by Gieseke et al (2002), Li et al (2003), and Yin et al (2015), whereas an average between 70 and 90% has been reported elsewhere (Garzon-Zuniga and GonzalezMartinez, 1996;Rahimi et al, 2011). Further, some suggest an additional carbon source or chemical precipitation are needed to achieve low effluent P levels (Pastorelli et al, 1999;Wang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Traditional Ebpr Systems and Recent Enhancementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The moving bed sequencing batch reactor had been reported as an effective method for COD, BOD, and TKN removal at 80, 90, and 86-93%, respectively (Sombatsompop et al 2011). Rahimi et al (2011) studied the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater with a fixed bed sequencing batch reactor (FBSBR). The study showed that COD, TN, and TP removal efficiency ranged between 90 and 96%, 60 and 88%, and 76 and 90%, respectively.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Wet Market Wastewater and Slaughterhouse mentioning
confidence: 99%