2008
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous NIR/sub-mm observation of flare emission from Sagittarius A*

Abstract: Context. We report on a successful, simultaneous observation and modeling of the sub-millimeter to near-infrared flare emission of the Sgr A* counterpart associated with the super-massive (4 × 10 6 M ) black hole at the Galactic center. Aims. We study and model the physical processes giving rise to the variable emission of Sgr A*. Methods. Our non-relativistic modeling is based on simultaneous observations that have been carried out on 03 June, 2008. We used the NACO adaptive optics (AO) instrument at the Euro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
101
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(74 reference statements)
15
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, expanding blob models, which are presented elsewhere in the literature, have the following problems: (i) some observations appear to require a redder spectral index in the NIR than allowed by our lower limit of β −0.5 (see e.g. models A and B of Table 4 in Eckart et al 2008); the spectral index is given there as α where S ν ∝ ν −α , so α = 1 − β; (ii) moreover, they require self-absorbed flare emission in the sub-mm, which can only occur for the electron densities and/or magnetic fields that are much higher than the typical values in the accretion flow around Sgr A* (Dodds-Eden et al 2010).…”
Section: Sed Models For An Nir/x-ray Flare With a Sub-mm Dipmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, expanding blob models, which are presented elsewhere in the literature, have the following problems: (i) some observations appear to require a redder spectral index in the NIR than allowed by our lower limit of β −0.5 (see e.g. models A and B of Table 4 in Eckart et al 2008); the spectral index is given there as α where S ν ∝ ν −α , so α = 1 − β; (ii) moreover, they require self-absorbed flare emission in the sub-mm, which can only occur for the electron densities and/or magnetic fields that are much higher than the typical values in the accretion flow around Sgr A* (Dodds-Eden et al 2010).…”
Section: Sed Models For An Nir/x-ray Flare With a Sub-mm Dipmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The explanation put forward in Dodds-Eden et al (2010) was that a dip in millimeter emission may occur due to the loss in emissivity of mm-emitting electrons that would occur in a magnetic reconnection event, in which significant magnetic energy is lost in the inner regions of the accretion flow. Eckart et al (2008) report a bright NIR flare and a sub-mm signal in which the lowest sub-mm flux is also coincident with the highest NIR flux (between 5 h and 6 h UT). Yusef-Zadeh et al (2010) have recently noted an anticorrelation in NIR/X-ray emission with sub-mm/mm emission, as well in previously published data, extending the number of observed examples to six.…”
Section: Submillimeter and Correlation With Nirmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use 0.007c as a typical value close to the expansion speeds found for other SgrA* flare events for which adiabatic expansion models have been applied (see e.g. Eckart et al 2008bEckart et al , 2009Yusef-Zadeh et al 2008). As an example of such a calculation we show in Fig.…”
Section: Modeling the April 4 2007 Nir/x-ray Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is flaring on an hourly timescale at multiple wavelengths (e.g., Baganoff et al 2001;Genzel et al 2003). Observations of Sgr A * have detected a time delay at submillimeter, millimeter, and radio wavelengths consistent with a scenario in which plasma blobs expand away from the disk, becoming visible at successive longer wavelengths as the optical depths become of order unity effects (Yusef-Zadeh et al 2006Eckart et al 2008;Marrone et al 2008;Brinkerink et al 2015). The other is a jet-driven outflow (e.g., Falcke & Markoff 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%