2007
DOI: 10.1080/03052150701399978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous model building and validation with uniform designs of experiments

Abstract: Bradford Scholars -how to deposit your paper Overview Copyright check• Check if your publisher allows submission to a repository.• Use the Sherpa RoMEO database if you are not sure about your publisher's position or email openaccess@bradford.ac.uk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where U is a pseudo-potential energy of DOE points, L ij is the distance between points i and j where i ≠ j, F is the objective function to be minimized, W is weighting factors, and, b, v, m denote model building, model validation and merged DOEs respectively [33].…”
Section: Optimisation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where U is a pseudo-potential energy of DOE points, L ij is the distance between points i and j where i ≠ j, F is the objective function to be minimized, W is weighting factors, and, b, v, m denote model building, model validation and merged DOEs respectively [33].…”
Section: Optimisation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data is similarly coupled to the large scale via a pressure gradient -mass flow rate relationship. The small scale data is represented by a Moving Least Squares (MLS) approximation, a metamodel describing this relationship is built and validated using k-fold Cross Validation (CV) in a method similar to that used by Loweth et al [35] and Narayanan et al [36]. This method employs an Optimum Latin Hypercube (OLHC) to populate the DoE used for small scale simulations, in order to span the entire design space as effectively as possible with the fewest number of designs [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottom level optimization aims at preserving the given values of the out-ofplane lamination parameters while shuffling the given number of plies to satisfy the layup rules and blending requirements.A permutation GA (Michalewicz 1992;Bates et al 2004;Narayanan et al 2007) is an ideal tool for such a composite laminate optimization problem. Each string in the coding represents a unique stacking sequence.…”
Section: Bottom Level Optimization Using a Permutation Gamentioning
confidence: 99%