2013
DOI: 10.1021/ac402247j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Measurement of Trace Metal and Oxyanion Concentrations in Water using Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films with a Chelex–Metsorb Mixed Binding Layer

Abstract: A new diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique with a mixed binding layer (Chelex-100 and the titanium dioxide based adsorbent Metsorb) is described for the simultaneous measurement of labile trace metal (Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Cd, and Pb) and oxyanion (V, As, Mo, Sb, W, and P) concentrations in freshwater and seawater. The mixed binding layer (MBL) DGT technique was evaluated against the Chelex-DGT and Metsorb-DGT techniques, and all elution efficiencies and diffusion coefficients have been remeasured for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
54
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is further supported by the Dcell value (6.60×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 ) with the matrix being changed to authentic freshwater, which agreed quite well with the synthetic NaNO3 solutions, demonstrating the good applicability of laboratory-measured Dcell value in field waters. The DDGT value (6.31×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 ) of W in this study was close to those published by Panther et al [24,28] and Shiva et al [49] (6.26/6.88/6.05/6.50×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 ) but 12% higher than the value (5.56×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 ) reported by Österlund et al [29]. In this study, an average Dcell value of 6.63×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 with IS varied from 0.001 to 0.5 mol L -1 was used for the calculation of DGT-measured concentrations.…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficients For W In the Diffusive Gelsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is further supported by the Dcell value (6.60×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 ) with the matrix being changed to authentic freshwater, which agreed quite well with the synthetic NaNO3 solutions, demonstrating the good applicability of laboratory-measured Dcell value in field waters. The DDGT value (6.31×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 ) of W in this study was close to those published by Panther et al [24,28] and Shiva et al [49] (6.26/6.88/6.05/6.50×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 ) but 12% higher than the value (5.56×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 ) reported by Österlund et al [29]. In this study, an average Dcell value of 6.63×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 with IS varied from 0.001 to 0.5 mol L -1 was used for the calculation of DGT-measured concentrations.…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficients For W In the Diffusive Gelsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The D values of W at 25 o C are listed in Table 1 Panther et al [24,28], but higher than the value (5.45×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 ) proposed by Österlund et al, [29].. However, when the IS was changed to a very low level of IS at 0.1 mmol L -1 , which is rare, the measured Dcell value increased by 40% to 9.26×10 -6 cm 2 s -1 .…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficients For W In the Diffusive Gelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can minimize the problems associated with conventional sampling methods such as analyte contamination and analyte speciation change during the sampling process [25,26]. This technique has unique advantages in allowing in situ measurements of a number of solutes at a high spatial resolution, which enables it to be a powerful tool in interpretation of biogeochemical processes related to key elements [16,24,27,28]. Recently, Motellca Hein et al [29] and Robertson et al [30,31] successfully applied a combined DGT to simultaneous measurements of Fe and S at a millimeter resolution [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%