1995
DOI: 10.1021/ie00045a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Iterative Solution Technique for Time-Optimal Control Using Dynamic Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, by a simple variable transformation, the problem was converted to one of combined optimal parameter selection and optimal control. The independent time variable was normalized and the final time became a decision variable only at the final stage of the IDP algorithm (Dadebo and McAuley, 1995b). Optimization results were similar to the fixed-end time studies, although the IDP algorithm appeared to have more difficulty in reaching the optimum for the variable end time approach.…”
Section: Variable End Time Approachmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In this case, by a simple variable transformation, the problem was converted to one of combined optimal parameter selection and optimal control. The independent time variable was normalized and the final time became a decision variable only at the final stage of the IDP algorithm (Dadebo and McAuley, 1995b). Optimization results were similar to the fixed-end time studies, although the IDP algorithm appeared to have more difficulty in reaching the optimum for the variable end time approach.…”
Section: Variable End Time Approachmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The importance of satisfying the state constraint throughout the time interval is evident from the results given in Table . It is unlikely that the piecewise constant control policy for the constrained arc used by Dadebo and McAuley can give better results than the ones obtained by the continuous control policy used in this work. For all the cases, the results are very close to the ones obtained by Maurer and Weigand .…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The second example is a time-optimal control problem introduced by Bell and Katusiime and solved, among others, by Maurer and Wiegand, Dadebo and McAuley, and Maurer and Vossen . The system equations are given by The states x 1 and x 2 represent the concentrations of unbound warfarin and phenylbutazone, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contracting the control region for each time stage after each cycle of dynamic programming computation, the IDP finally obtains an optimal control profile. Due to the advantages of being easily implemented on a personal computer and having greater possibility to obtain a globally optimal solution than a nonlinear programming method, the original IDP method and some of the improved versions (Lin and Hwang, 1996b;Hwang and Lin, 1998) have been successfully applied to solve various optimal control problems of nonlinear processes Luus, 1994a,b, 1996;Dadebo and McAuley, 1995b;Keil, 1993a, 1994;Hartig et al, 1996;Keil et al, 1996;Luus, 1990cLuus, , 1991Luus, , 1993aLuus and Bojkov, 1994;Luus et al, 1992;Luus and Galli, 1991;Mekarapiruk and Luus, 1997), including time-delay systems (Dadebo and Luus, 1992;Dadebo and McAuley, 1995a;Lin and Hwang, 1996a) and systems with a large number of state and control variables (Bojkov and Luus, 1992a,b, 1993Hartig and Keil, 1993b;Luus, 1990bLuus, , 1993dLuus and Smith, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%