The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1999
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199905000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Ipsilateral Femoral and Tibial Lengthening with the Ilizarov Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the risk associated with simultaneous femoral and tibial lengthening was substantially higher than that associated with isolated single-level femoral lengthening (2%); four of 214 or tibial lengthening (4%); fourteen of 351. Previous studies [19][20][21][22] did not demonstrate a higher prevalence of nerve compromise with double-level lengthening of the femur or tibia compared with that associated with isolated femoral or tibial lengthening. Double-level lengthening greatly decreases the distraction and consolidation times 23 ; since peroneal nerve decompression is a relatively minor procedure, it is worth performing double-level lengthening even if decompression will become necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, the risk associated with simultaneous femoral and tibial lengthening was substantially higher than that associated with isolated single-level femoral lengthening (2%); four of 214 or tibial lengthening (4%); fourteen of 351. Previous studies [19][20][21][22] did not demonstrate a higher prevalence of nerve compromise with double-level lengthening of the femur or tibia compared with that associated with isolated femoral or tibial lengthening. Double-level lengthening greatly decreases the distraction and consolidation times 23 ; since peroneal nerve decompression is a relatively minor procedure, it is worth performing double-level lengthening even if decompression will become necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Healing indices (time in fixator/length gained) for limb‐lengthening range from 28 to 36 days per centimeter. (2–4) Variable techniques have been pursued to reduce the impact of the prolonged healing time on the patient, including lengthening with a fixator over an intramedullary nail and distraction using a lengthening nail (5–7) . These methods, while promising, lend their own array of complications to the procedure and cannot be applied to many patients because of the need for deformity correction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported to range between 28 days/cm and 36 days/cm. 4,5 There have been several studies which have investigated methods of accelerating this. 6,7 Bisphosphonates are stable pyrophosphate analogues which are distributed mainly to sites of exposed hydroxyapatite where they inhibit bone resorption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%