2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-014-0312-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous, independent, and additive effects of shrub facilitation and understory competition on the survival of a native forb (Penstemon palmeri)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can probably lead to a strong underground niche overlap between N. sphaerocarpa and their understory plants, and partly explain the negative shifting in shrub-understory plant interactions with increase in patch size. As reported in previous studies, this root competition from mature plants can reduce the survival of their understory species (Good et al, 2014;Shiponeni et al, 2014), or lead to an overall neutral planteplant interaction (Poulos et al, 2014). On the other hand, the interaction shift may also result from direct impacts by shrub canopies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This can probably lead to a strong underground niche overlap between N. sphaerocarpa and their understory plants, and partly explain the negative shifting in shrub-understory plant interactions with increase in patch size. As reported in previous studies, this root competition from mature plants can reduce the survival of their understory species (Good et al, 2014;Shiponeni et al, 2014), or lead to an overall neutral planteplant interaction (Poulos et al, 2014). On the other hand, the interaction shift may also result from direct impacts by shrub canopies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although positive interactions between shrubs and their neighbors are very common in stressed environments, shrubs can also have profoundly negative effects on many aspects of the understory plants, such as seedling performances (Poulos et al, 2014), plants diversity (Rayburn and Schupp, 2013), species coexistence (Maestre et al, 2009), and spatial patterns (Li et al, 2010). Over the past decade, numerous studies indicated that the balance between facilitation and interference may well depend on environmental context (Lortie and Callaway, 2006;Michalet, 2006;Maestre et al, 2009;He et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nurse effects, however, might vary from positive to negative depending on the target species that establishes under nurse crown, and this process is referred as a species-specific interaction outcome (Callaway, 1998;Callaway & Walker, 1997). Species-specific interaction outcomes have been found to occur in a wide range of ecosystems (Landero & Valiente-Banuet, 2010;Paterno, Siqueira, & Ganade, 2016;Poulos, Rayburn, & Schupp, 2014) and have been pointed out as a strong factor modulating seedling regeneration in plant communities (Paterno et al, 2016). However, predicting the outcome of nurse-target interactions can be difficult, especially in high diversity ecosystems where multiple pairs of nurse and target species are able to interact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the already established plants may provide a positive 'nurse' plant effect (e.g., Close et al 2010) via either physical (e.g., spines) or chemical (e.g., toxins) protection from herbivory or by simply reducing the visibility of newly established plants to herbivores (Smit et al 2007). However, while this strategy might reduce herbivory, beneficial effects from nurse plant are not consistently observed in restoration studies since increased competition resulting from the close proximity of neighbours can outweigh facilitation effects (Gómez-Aparicio et al 2004;Caldeira et al 2014;Poulos et al 2014): facilitation is most likely to be observed with increasing abiotic stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%