Simultaneous implant placement with ridge augmentation using an autogenous bone ring transplant

Omara, Mohammed; Abdel-Wahed, Nagla’a; Ahmed, M. K.; Hindy, Mohamed A.

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.001

Cited by 30 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The use of grafting materials in fresh extraction sockets has been questioned because they could interfere with the normal healing process in the sockets in which oral implants are to be inserted. The grafting materials could have negative effects on revascularization [9,29]. The reduction in vascular supply caused by intrasocket grafts may cause slower resorption of the alveolar ridge, because greater vascular supply could lead to faster resorption [30].…”

Section: Biomed Research Internationalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ridge Alterations following Socket Preservation Using a Collagen Membrane in Dogs

Lyu

Shao

Zou

et al. 2020

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The healing process following tooth extraction results in alveolar ridge resorption. The dimensional changes may complicate the subsequent implant procedure. Socket preservation using absorbable collagen membranes or a combination of membranes with calcium phosphate cement (CPC) particles might ensure that the alveolar ridge retains a suitable morphology for implant placement. Objective. To evaluate the quality and quantity of new bone regenerated after application of either collagen membranes alone covering the sockets or a combination of membranes with CPC particles added into the sockets in dogs. Materials and Methods. Six dogs were included in this study. The mandibular premolars were extracted. For each hemimandible, three premolar extraction sites were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: a covering collagen membrane, CPC with a covering collagen membrane, and a socket left empty. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements, polyfluorochrome sequential labeling, and histological assessments were performed to investigate the healing ability and repair processes within a 6-month observation period. Results. Buccal bone height in the membrane group was significantly higher than that in the membrane+CPC and blank groups at 4 and 6 months after extraction. The mineral apposition rate over 2-4 months and the alizarin red-stained area in the membrane group were significantly higher than those in the other two groups. Histological analysis after 6 months of healing showed significantly higher amounts of newly formed bone in the membrane group than in the other groups. Conclusion. Extraction sites treated with collagen barrier membranes showed better protection than sites not covered with membranes. And the buccal bone wall of the socket was well preserved by collagen membrane without extra CPC materials. Socket preservation using absorbable membranes alone yielded better quality and quantity of regenerated bone inside the socket site.

show abstract

Section: Biomed Research Internationalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ridge Alterations following Socket Preservation Using a Collagen Membrane in Dogs

Lyu

Shao

Zou

et al. 2020

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These lesions indirectly affected the bone grafts and resulted in advanced resorption of the residual alveolar ridge (Figure ). A spontaneous exposure of the augmented sites may have been induced by the sharp edges of the cortical bone graft (Omara, Abdelwahed, Ahmed & Hindy, ) as shown for immediate implant placement (Nemcovsky, Artzi, Moses & Gelernter, ). The size of the membrane screw used as a healing cap and the placement of the membrane further increased the tension on the soft tissue in the present study and thus contributing to the development of dehiscences.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single‐staged implant placement using bone ring technique with and without membrane placement: An experimental study in the Beagle dog

Haga‐Tsujimura

Nakahara

Kobayashi

et al. 2017

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3) Fibrin network entraps platelets and leukocytes to release growth factors, so bone regeneration and soft tissue is accelerated; 4) No biochemical additives are needed to make sticky bone; 5) Fibrin interconnection minimizes soft tissue ingrowth into the sticky bone graft 11,12 . This encouraged authors to augment the severely defective socket three-dimensionally with sticky bone with/ without titanium mesh and immediate implant placement in a one-stage procedure to reduce time of treatment 12 . In the same context, a new technique was developed by authors [15][16][17][18] to augment the defective socket with autologous "bone ring" graft harvested from chin with simultaneous implant placement. By this technique, the harvested rings can then be secured to the extraction socket using the dental implants restoring the deficient crestal bone in a three dimensions fashion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Autogenous bone ring transplant versus sticky bone in defective socket augmentation with simultaneous implant placemen

Baiomy¹,

Abdelmabood

2020

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim : This study was designed to evaluate efficacy of autologous concentrated growth factors enriched bone graft matrix (sticky bone) bone versus autogenous chin bone ring in the premolarmolar region with simultaneous implant placement. Patients and methods: Twenty patients had fresh defective extraction sockets in the mandibular premolar-molar region with severely compromised buccal bone divided randomly into equal groups (in group I; sockets were augmented by sticky bone, and in group II; sockets were augmented by chin bone ring). Then dental implants were placed in the same visit and were covered by collagen membrane in both groups. Clinical and radiographic examinations were done to evaluate the soft tissue, stability of dental implant, crestal bone level, and bone density around dental implants immediate (1 st week) postoperatively and at, 3 rd , 6 th , 9 th , and 12 th month postoperatively. All readings were recorded and evaluated statistically. Results: Clinically, group II showed little postoperative complications in comparing group I. in the other side, both groups did not show any statistical significance difference in implant stability and probing pocket depth parameters. Radiographically, group I had highly statistical significance more than group II (P <0.001) in bone density and marginal bone level parameters along time of study. Conclusion: Both techniques were successful methods for 3D augmentation of severely defective sockets with immediate placement of dental implant with superiority for autogenous bone ring in aspects of marginal bone level, and density of bone around dental implant.

show abstract

Simultaneous implant placement with ridge augmentation using an autogenous bone ring transplant

Cited by 30 publications

References 25 publications

Ridge Alterations following Socket Preservation Using a Collagen Membrane in Dogs

Ridge Alterations following Socket Preservation Using a Collagen Membrane in Dogs

Single‐staged implant placement using bone ring technique with and without membrane placement: An experimental study in the Beagle dog

Autogenous bone ring transplant versus sticky bone in defective socket augmentation with simultaneous implant placemen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About