2009
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-27-2881-2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous imaging of aurora on small scale in OI (777.4 nm) and N<sub>2</sub>1P to estimate energy and flux of precipitation

Abstract: Abstract. Simultaneous images of the aurora in three emissions, N21P (673.0 nm), OII (732.0 nm) and OI (777.4 nm), have been analysed; the ratio of atomic oxygen to molecular nitrogen has been used to provide estimates of the changes in energy and flux of precipitation within scale sizes of 100 m, and with temporal resolution of 32 frames per second. The choice of filters for the imagers is discussed, with particular emphasis on the choice of the atomic oxygen line at 777.4 nm as one of the three emissions mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using high‐resolution optical instruments and incoherent scatter radar, Lanchester et al [] noted a very large energy flux (>500 mW/m 2 ) within a 100 m wide filament of monoenergetic precipitation, located within a wider region of precipitation of lower energy flux. Other observations of auroral filaments and curls have shown that they are associated with both higher energy and higher electron fluxes than the surrounding precipitation [ Lanchester et al , ; Dahlgren et al , , ]. Ivchenko et al [] showed that curls are caused by high‐energy precipitation, which would be a signature of an electrostatic acceleration mechanism above the ionosphere, whereas auroral rays are the result of both high‐ and low‐energy electrons, which indicates acceleration by wave‐particle interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using high‐resolution optical instruments and incoherent scatter radar, Lanchester et al [] noted a very large energy flux (>500 mW/m 2 ) within a 100 m wide filament of monoenergetic precipitation, located within a wider region of precipitation of lower energy flux. Other observations of auroral filaments and curls have shown that they are associated with both higher energy and higher electron fluxes than the surrounding precipitation [ Lanchester et al , ; Dahlgren et al , , ]. Ivchenko et al [] showed that curls are caused by high‐energy precipitation, which would be a signature of an electrostatic acceleration mechanism above the ionosphere, whereas auroral rays are the result of both high‐ and low‐energy electrons, which indicates acceleration by wave‐particle interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imagers operate at 32 frames per second. Here, we present data obtained with the 6730 Å filter for the N21P band emission excited by high-energy electron precipitation (ASK1, e.g., Ashrafi et al, 2009) and the 7774 Å filter observing emission from atomic oxygen excited by low-energy electron precipitation (ASK3, e.g., Lanchester et al, 2009). The field of view of these imagers is 6.2 × 6.2 • and is centered at magnetic zenith.…”
Section: Instrumentation and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Auroral Structures and Kinetics (ASK, e.g., Lanchester et al, 2009) optical instrument is co-located with the EISCAT Svalbard radar facility. ASK operates three imagers observing in the direction of the geomagnetic field.…”
Section: Instrumentation and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this wavelength there are also underlying N 2 emission bands, produced by high-energy precipitation [Dahlgren et al, 2008a]. The third imager measures the atomic oxygen emission at 777.4 nm (I O ), which in the aurora is most sensitive to low-energy precipitation [Lanchester et al, 2009] and results from direct excitation of atomic oxygen in the ionospheric F region. It is also produced by high-energy precipitating electrons through dissociative excitation of molecular oxygen in the E region.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%