2022
DOI: 10.22159/ijap.2022v14i1.42208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Estimation of Azilsartan and Cilnidipine in Bulk by Rp-HPLC and Assessment of Its Applicability in Marketed Tablet Dosage Form

Abstract: Objective: This study aims to build up the RP-HPLC process for Azilsartan and Cilnidipine and authenticate the RP-HPLC process according to ICH validation code Q2R1. Methods: System suitability testing was performed to discover the qualifying criterion of the method by injecting the identical standard solution of Azilsartan 40μg/ml and Cilnidipine 10μg/ml in mixture/combination in subsequent optimized chromatographic conditions and the chromatogram was recorded. Moreover, the planned method was validated as p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak response, plate count, resolution, and tailing symmetry are measured and summarized in table 4. Swati and Anna (2022) reported the RP-HPLC method for quality control analysis of AZIL and CLIN blend in marketed formulations [28]. Riddhi and Satish quantified AZIL and CLIN blend in mixtures developed at lab using spectrophotometry [25].…”
Section: Azil and Ciln Degradation Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peak response, plate count, resolution, and tailing symmetry are measured and summarized in table 4. Swati and Anna (2022) reported the RP-HPLC method for quality control analysis of AZIL and CLIN blend in marketed formulations [28]. Riddhi and Satish quantified AZIL and CLIN blend in mixtures developed at lab using spectrophotometry [25].…”
Section: Azil and Ciln Degradation Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riddhi and Satish quantified AZIL and CLIN blend in mixtures developed at lab using spectrophotometry [25]. It was discovered that the Swati and Anna method [28] had an excessive retention time, which increased the time for analysis and the cost of study. Riddhi and Satish [25] did not extend their approach to formulations, nor did they conduct degradation experiments on AZIL and CLIN.…”
Section: Azil and Ciln Degradation Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few approaches are described in the literature for the estimation of AZL and CIL (Andhalea and Nikalje, 2022; O n l i n e F i r s t Jani andPatel, 2018a, 2018b;Jena et al, 2021;Solanki et al, 2022). However, several high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy techniques for estimating AZL and CIL alone or combined with other drugs are reported (Desai and Nikalje, 2021;Deshmukh et al, 2020;Ghante et al, 2019;Kumar and Begum, 2019;Rathod et al, 2018;Ruhina and Mamatha, 2017;Soliman et al, 2019;Surwade and Saudagar, 2015;Vyas et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 It is reported officially in Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP)-2018. 4 Literature study revealed that the analytical techniques like HPTLC, [5][6] HPLC, [7][8] UVspectrophotometry, 9,10 LC/MS-MS [11][12] methods have been presented for determination of Azilsartan medoxomil and Cilnidipine as a single, while for the combination of Azilsartan medoxomil and Cilnidipine method is available on UV-spectroscopy 13 and HPLC, 14 there is no article related to Stability Indicating HPLC Assay method to quantify Azilsartan medoxomil and Cilnidipine in bulk has ever been mentioned within literature referred. The primary goal of this project was to produce a specific, accurate, and reproducible stability indicating HPLC methods for determination of Azilsartan medoxomil and Cilnidipine as stated in the ICH guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%