Simultaneous electrokinetic removal and in situ electrochemical degradation of a high nitrogen accumulated greenhouse soil

Zhou, Cong; Song, Yue; Liu, Ying; Ding, Xiaodong; Wang, Jie; Yin, Yongguang; Xiao, Changfa; Yang, Zhen; Cai, Yong

doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2023.141906

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two types of saline soils within the depth of 0-30 cm were sampled in July 2016: a secondary salinization soil from the Vegetables and Flowers Institute of Hohai University test base (31 38 ′ 29 ′′ N, 120 • 54 ′ 09 ′′ E). The salt in secondary salinization soil was predominantly Ca(NO 3 ) 2 and KNO 3 , while that in coastal saline soil was predominantly NaCl, based on our and others' previous studies [31][32][33][34][35]. Their electrical conductivity (EC) was about 2.81 dS m −1 and 3.25 dS m −1 .…”

Section: Experimental Soilmentioning

confidence: 67%

Interactive Effects of Microbial Fertilizer and Soil Salinity on the Hydraulic Properties of Salt-Affected Soil

Yang,

Zhang,

Chang

et al. 2024

Plants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Significant research has been conducted on the effects of fertilizers or agents on the sustainable development of agriculture in salinization areas. By contrast, limited consideration has been given to the interactive effects of microbial fertilizer (MF) and salinity on hydraulic properties in secondary salinization soil (SS) and coastal saline soil (CS). An incubation experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of saline soil types, salinity levels (non-saline, low-salinity, and high-salinity soils), and MF amounts (32.89 g kg−1 and 0 g kg−1) on soil hydraulic properties. Applied MF improved soil water holding capacity in each saline soil compared with that in CK, and SS was higher than CS. Applied MF increased saturated moisture, field capacity, capillary fracture moisture, the wilting coefficient, and the hygroscopic coefficient by 0.02–18.91% in SS, while it was increased by 11.62–181.88% in CS. It increased soil water supply capacity in SS (except for high-salinity soil) and CS by 0.02–14.53% and 0.04–2.34%, respectively, compared with that in CK. Soil available, readily available, and unavailable water were positively correlated with MF, while soil gravity and readily available and unavailable water were positively correlated with salinity in SS. Therefore, a potential fertilization program with MF should be developed to increase hydraulic properties or mitigate the adverse effects of salinity on plants in similar SS or CS areas.

show abstract