2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous dynamic optimization: A trajectory planning method for nonholonomic car-like robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1. It should be noted that in [15], the authors achieved the collision-free with respect to and by transforming these two points to the vehicle's body frame. However, this intuitive restriction of the slot corner might introduce discontinuity, which will have negative effects for the optimization solver.…”
Section: B Automatic Parking Process Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remark 1. It should be noted that in [15], the authors achieved the collision-free with respect to and by transforming these two points to the vehicle's body frame. However, this intuitive restriction of the slot corner might introduce discontinuity, which will have negative effects for the optimization solver.…”
Section: B Automatic Parking Process Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This subsection presents a comparative study in terms of the optimal parking movement achieved by performing the proposed two-stage strategy and other optimization-based trajectory planning techniques reported in the literature. For instance, an IPM-based direct transcription method outlined in [15] and an artificial bee colony-based (ABC) intelligent optimization method studied in [29]. For the purpose of comparison, the default setting suggested in the original paper is used.…”
Section: Comparison Against Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach marks a clear difference with other planners that only include kinematic constraints, as in Simba et al [15,16]. Those planners either are conservative or do not guarantee the feasibility of the trajectories, as in Li and Shao [17] and Tokekar et al [18].…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the geometric planning methods, some form of curves such as β-spline [3], Bézier [4,5], clothoid [6], or polynomial curves [7,8] are generated as a set of reference trajectories. The mathematical optimization approaches, firstly formulating a cost function of the automatic parking problem and then minimizing the objective cost function [9][10][11][12][13]. Besides car-like vehicles, reference trajectory is feasible in the case of parking N-trailer vehicles when complicated kinematic constraints are taken into account in planning the trajectory [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%