2020
DOI: 10.1093/ptep/ptaa130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous determination of the cosmic birefringence and miscalibrated polarization angles II: Including cross-frequency spectra

Abstract: We develop a strategy to determine the cosmic birefringence and miscalibrated polarization angles simultaneously using the observed EB polarization power spectra of the cosmic microwave background and the Galactic foreground emission. We extend the methodology of Y. Minami et al. (Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 083E02, 2019), which was developed for auto frequency power spectra, by including cross frequency spectra. By fitting one global birefringence angle and independent miscalibration angles at different fre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method was developed originally in Ref. [25] for autofrequency power spectra measured over the full sky, and has been extended to include a partial sky coverage [26] and cross-frequency spectra [27]. The idea is simple: while α ν rotates linear polarization of both the CMB and Galactic foreground emission, β rotates only the CMB.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method was developed originally in Ref. [25] for autofrequency power spectra measured over the full sky, and has been extended to include a partial sky coverage [26] and cross-frequency spectra [27]. The idea is simple: while α ν rotates linear polarization of both the CMB and Galactic foreground emission, β rotates only the CMB.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimate one global cosmic birefringence angle, β, and independent miscalibration angles, α ν , at four frequencies. When the intrinsic EB power spectra of the CMB at LSS and the Galactic foregrounds vanish, we can relate the observed power spectra and the best-fitting ΛCDM CMB power spectra [33] at each as [27] A C o − B C CMB,th = 0,…”
Section: Estimation Of α and βmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the methodology developed in Refs. [124][125][126] to the Planck high-freuqency instrument (HFI) data at ν = 100, 143, 217 and 353 GHz released in 2018 127 , a weak signal of β = 0.35 • ± 0.14 • was reported for nearly full-sky data 31 . Throughout this section, we quote uncertainties at the 68 % C.L.…”
Section: Results From the Planck Polarisation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it was reported in Ref. [32] that the Planck 2018 polarization data of cosmic microwave background (CMB) favors a nonzero value of isotropic CB, with statistical significance of 2.4 σ, based on the novel method [33][34][35]. The suggested rotation angle of the CMB polarization is 1 β = 0.35 ± 0.14 deg, (1) and future observations of CMB will reduce statistical uncertainties by more than one order of magnitude [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%