2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous determination of linezolid and voriconazole serum concentrations using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All TDM samples were collected before the next dose at a steady state (C min ). The recommended concentration ranges for meropenem, linezolid, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and vancomycin were fT > MIC100 % [ 30 ], 2.0–7.0 μg/mL [ 15 ], at least 1.9–6.7 μg/mL [ 31 ], 1.0–5.5 μg/mL [ 15 ], 1–6 μg/mL [ 31 ], 10.0–20.0 μg/mL [ 12 ], respectively. As illustrated in Table 8 , C min of 6 special-grade antimicrobials varied considerably among individuals and many C min values were outside the recommended concentration ranges, including 36.4 % (8/22) of meropenem, 64.7 % (11/17) of linezolid, 33.3 % (1/3) of fluconazole, 66.7 % (8/12) of voriconazole, 41.2 % (7/17) of posaconazole, and 68.0 % (17/25) of vancomycin samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All TDM samples were collected before the next dose at a steady state (C min ). The recommended concentration ranges for meropenem, linezolid, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and vancomycin were fT > MIC100 % [ 30 ], 2.0–7.0 μg/mL [ 15 ], at least 1.9–6.7 μg/mL [ 31 ], 1.0–5.5 μg/mL [ 15 ], 1–6 μg/mL [ 31 ], 10.0–20.0 μg/mL [ 12 ], respectively. As illustrated in Table 8 , C min of 6 special-grade antimicrobials varied considerably among individuals and many C min values were outside the recommended concentration ranges, including 36.4 % (8/22) of meropenem, 64.7 % (11/17) of linezolid, 33.3 % (1/3) of fluconazole, 66.7 % (8/12) of voriconazole, 41.2 % (7/17) of posaconazole, and 68.0 % (17/25) of vancomycin samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several LC–MS/MS methods have been published to determine different antibacterials, summarized in Table 9 and compared with our method. Most reported methods usually targeted the same class of antimicrobials, e.g., beta-lactams or azoles [ [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] ]. This means that several methods should be applied in the routine TDM to cover different antimicrobials mentioned in this article.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) Centrifuge: Used for centrifugal separation of solid particles and liquids in drugs and samples. (5) Oven: Used to dry the samples or reagents. (6) pH meter: Used to determine the acid-base properties of drugs or reagents.…”
Section: Experimental Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional chemical analysis methods can be limited by sample complexity and low concentration of components, whereas liquid-mass spectrometry can overcome these difficulties and provide highly sensitive, selective, and attributable chemical analysis results. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) combines chromatographic separation and mass spectrometry detection technologies to achieve accurate identification and quantitative analysis of multiple chemical components in complex samples, with the advantages of high sensitivity, accuracy, and throughput [5] . In kidney tonic and aphrodisiac herbal preparations, LC-MS can help identify and quantify various active ingredients, such as phytosterols, alkaloids, flavonoids, polysaccharides, and peptides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%