1998
DOI: 10.1097/00000433-199806000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Death of Twins: An Environmental Hazard or SIDS?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors rejected the diagnosis of simultaneous SIDS, and instead conclude that a combination of several environmental factors (sub-lethal levels of carbon monoxide, over wrapping and mechanical obstruction of upper airways) resulted in death. Carter et al challenged their findings and felt that deliberate smothering was a possibility, and stated that although smothering could not be proven they would have alerted the relevant caring agencies and would have assigned the cause of death as "unascertained" [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors rejected the diagnosis of simultaneous SIDS, and instead conclude that a combination of several environmental factors (sub-lethal levels of carbon monoxide, over wrapping and mechanical obstruction of upper airways) resulted in death. Carter et al challenged their findings and felt that deliberate smothering was a possibility, and stated that although smothering could not be proven they would have alerted the relevant caring agencies and would have assigned the cause of death as "unascertained" [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature mainly deals with single case reports [5,6]. The deaths are classified as either simultaneous sudden infant death syndrome in twins [7,8], or due to injuries associated with environmental hazards [9] or "unascertained" [10]. The literature is limited and generates strong opinions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%