Simultaneous custom-made replacement of the temporomandibular joint and cranioplasty

Kirchheimer, S.; Sainuddin, Sajid; Bojanić, Stana; Saeed, Nadeem

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.04.256

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…6,10,30,33 Surgical approaches may provide rapid results, 30 but the post-surgical complications, especially post-surgical fibrosis, may result in further limitations of mouth opening. Several causes exist for microstomia, but most microstomia cases in the included studies were due to post-surgical com plications, [2][3][4]9,12,17,18,[23][24][25][26]28,34 and scleroderma/systemic scler osis. 5,6,8,10,[13][14][15][19][20][21][22]27,29,32 Other less common reasons include congenital maxilla-facial syngnathia, 9 muscular dystrophy, 31 burn injuries, 7,11 Freeman-Sheldon syndrome 30 and one case of coexisting systemic lupus erythematosus and scleroderma 16 The various techniques and appliances used for the prosthetic rehabilitation of microstomia patients are described below.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thirteen (38.2%) of the 34 reported microstomia cases were due to post-surgical complications, [2][3][4]9,12,17,18,[23][24][25][26]28,34 and 14 (41.1%) cases were due to scleroderma/systemic sclerosis, 5,6,8,10,[13][14][15][19][20][21][22]27,29,32 . Two cases of burn injuries, 7,11 and, one case each of Freeman-Sheldon syndrome, 30 muscular dystrophy, 31 and congenital maxillomandibular syngnathia, 33 and one case of coexisting systemic lupus erythematosus and scleroderma 16 .…”

Section: Reported Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eight cases involved the use of pre-prosthetic surgical and/or non-surgical therapy to aid in the placement of the prosthesis. 2,6,10,30,33 The most frequently used impression technique was the sectional impression tray [8 (23.5%) cases], 5,12,14,22,23,27,31,32 followed by flexible, folded, and semi-rigid impression tray [4 (11.7%) cases]. 3,7,12,19 Other impression techniques included the use of a plasticized intermediary liner to make the impression [1 (2.9%) case] 25 and recording of the impression via manually dispensing a putty-type impression material intra-orally [1 (2.9%) case].…”

Section: Reported Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Acquired microstomia is a leading post-surgical complication of the oral cavity. [2][3][4] Other common causes of acquired microstomia include perioral burns and connective tissue disorders, such as scleroderma. 5 Acquired microstomia cases due to connective tissue disorders are progressive in nature and lead to significant interference in day-to-day activities, such as speech, deglutition, and oral hygiene maintenance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Microstomia Patients: A Systematic Review of Published Case Reports and Case Series

Patil

Raj

Sarode

et al. 2019

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Statement of problem: Prosthetic techniques commonly employed for the rehabilitation of edentulous patients might not be adequate in the treatment of patients with microstomia. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to systematically review all the prosthetic techniques that have been used in the oral rehabilitation of patients with microstomia. Materials and methods: Data sources, including PubMed, Google Scholar, SCOPUS and Web of Science, were searched for case reports and case series published through September 2017. Three investigators reviewed and verified the extracted data. Only case reports and case series on prosthetic rehabilitation in microstomia patients published in the English language were considered eligible. Results: A total of 212 records were identified from the database search. Forty duplicate records were removed. The remaining 172 articles were assessed for eligibility, and 139 articles were removed because they did not satisfy the inclusion criteria. A total of 34 cases (including 32 case reports and 1 case series) were finally included in the qualitative analysis. The review revealed the use of a modified impression technique with flexible and sectional trays to record impressions in patients with microstomia. Modified forms of oral prostheses ranging from sectional, flexible, collapsible and hinged dentures to implant-supported prosthesis were fabricated to overcome the limited mouth opening. The success of the prosthetic technique primarily depended on the extent of the microstomia and the nature of the cause of the microstomia. Conclusion:Even though the patient acceptance of the prosthetic techniques summarized in the systematic review were high, long-term success rates for each option could not be assessed because of the short follow-up time in most of the included case reports and series.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reported Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reported Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Microstomia Patients: A Systematic Review of Published Case Reports and Case Series

Patil

Raj

Sarode

et al. 2019

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thinking about the essential standards of an extended joint substitution [71][72][73] the consolidated prosthesis, temporal bone, as well as zygomatic curve were embedded and fitted with titanium sheet and screws (Stryker Fixation System, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) in perspective of the past occlusal relationship and the organizing condition between the prosthesis and the surface bone ( Figure 10(b)). Fat reaped from the buccal fat cushion (a few parts), just as under the skin in the pre-auricular or submandibular territories, was folded over the condylar head.…”

Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants

Memon

Wang

et al. 2020

Expert Review of Medical Devices

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Various prefabricated maxillofacial implants are used in the clinical routine for the surgical treatment of patients. In addition to these prefabricated implants, customized CAD/CAM implants become increasingly important for a more precise replacement of damaged anatomical structures. This paper reviews the design and manufacturing of patient-specific implants for the maxillofacial area. Areas covered: The contribution of this publication is to give a state-of-the-art overview in the usage of customized facial implants. Moreover, it provides future perspectives, including 3D printing technologies, for the manufacturing of patient-individual facial implants that are based on patient's data acquisitions, like Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Expert opinion: The main target of this review is to present various designing software and 3D manufacturing technologies that have been applied to fabricate facial implants. In doing so, different CAD designing software's are discussed, which are based on various methods and have been implemented and evaluated by researchers. Finally, recent 3D printing technologies that have been applied to manufacture patient-individual implants will be introduced and discussed.

show abstract

Temporomandibular Joints

Spencer¹,

Neary²

2017

Temporomandibular Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Simultaneous custom-made replacement of the temporomandibular joint and cranioplasty

Cited by 4 publications

References 6 publications

Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Microstomia Patients: A Systematic Review of Published Case Reports and Case Series

Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Microstomia Patients: A Systematic Review of Published Case Reports and Case Series

A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants

Temporomandibular Joints

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About