2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2007.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous confidence bands for Abbott-adjusted quantal response models in benchmark analysis

Abstract: We study use of a Scheffé-style simultaneous confidence band as applied to low-dose risk estimation with quantal response data. We consider two formulations for the dose-response risk function, an Abbott-adjusted Weibull model and an Abbott-adjusted log-logistic model. Using the simultaneous construction, we derive methods for estimating upper confidence limits on predicted extra risk and, by inverting the upper bands on risk, lower bounds on the benchmark dose, or BMD, at which a specific level of 'benchmark … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameterizations for were then determined by specifying response rates at the points ( x 1 , x 2 )= (0,0), (0,1), (1,0) for () and ( x 1 , x 2 )= (0,0), (0,), (0,1), (,0), (1,0), (1,1) for (); see the upper portions of each sub‐table. These represent a variety of response surfaces combined from single‐regressor risk models given previously by Bailer and Smith (1994) and Buckley and Piegorsch (2008). All parameterizations were studied over the same constraint region , with the upper limits equal to the largest dose on each scale: Ω 1 =Ω 2 = 1.…”
Section: Bmpl Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameterizations for were then determined by specifying response rates at the points ( x 1 , x 2 )= (0,0), (0,1), (1,0) for () and ( x 1 , x 2 )= (0,0), (0,), (0,1), (,0), (1,0), (1,1) for (); see the upper portions of each sub‐table. These represent a variety of response surfaces combined from single‐regressor risk models given previously by Bailer and Smith (1994) and Buckley and Piegorsch (2008). All parameterizations were studied over the same constraint region , with the upper limits equal to the largest dose on each scale: Ω 1 =Ω 2 = 1.…”
Section: Bmpl Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under a Weibull model, R( x ; β ) = γ 0 + (1 − γ 0 )[1 − exp {− e β 0 x β 1 }] = γ 0 + (1−γ 0 )[1 − exp{−exp(β 0 + β 1 log[ x ])}], we again recover an Abbott-adjusted dose-response function, now with extra risk R E ( x ) = 1 − exp{−exp(β 0 + β 1 log[ x ])} (Buckley and Piegorsch, 2008). Thus the expression for BM̂D 100BMR is once again similar to (A.6): BM̂D 100BMR = exp{(W BMR − b 0 )/b 1 }, with W BMR = log{−log(1 − BMR)}.…”
Section: Calculating Bmds and Bmdls Under The Dose-response Models Inmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This has the same structure as model M6—called an Abbott-adjusted model (Buckley and Piegorsch, 2008)—with the logistic c.d.f. in M6 replaced by the standard normal c.d.f.…”
Section: Calculating Bmds and Bmdls Under The Dose-response Models Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the focus of this paper is on logistic regression, the methods described here require only that there exists a regression line of the form x0truebold-italictrueβ̂=ffalse(p(x)false) with f () being some link function and an approximately normal boldβ̂ with some covariance matrix J1. The simultaneous confidence sets considered in this paper immediately extend to the probit model, log logistic or even the Weibull models such as those described in Buckley and Piegorsch () and Deutsch and Piegorsch (). Indeed these methods also extend to the normal linear regression model in which the unknown variance σ 2 needs to be estimated too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%