Abstract:For anthracites and petroleum cokes, the typical combustion temperature in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) is > 900°C. At CO 2 concentrations of 80-85 % (typical of oxy-fuel CFBC conditions), limestone still calcines. When the ash which includes unreacted CaO cools to the calcination temperature, carbonation of fly ash deposited on cool surfaces may occur. At the same time, indirect and direct sulfation of limestone also will occur, possibly leading to more deposition. In this study, CaO was carbonated and s… Show more
“…Wang et al investigated simultaneous carbonation and sulfation of CaO under oxyfuel CFBC conditions. 111 The results showed that, when the ash containing CaO cooled calcination temperature, carbonation of fly ash deposited on cool surfaces occurred. Simultaneously, indirect and direct sulfation of limestone would also occur, possibly leading to more deposition.…”
Section: Ash Formation and Deposition In Oxy-fbcmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This was ascribed to the inhibition of sulfation by the high CO 2 partial pressure and the reduction of alkali metals in the fly ash. Wang et al also found that, under conditions of oxy-FBC, ash carbonation was faster than sulfation . The ashes generated in a 10 kW th fluidized bed unit using a Victorian brown coal in both air and oxyfuel combustion were characterized .…”
Section: Ash Formation and Deposition
In Oxy-fbcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of sulfur oxides in the flue gas can make the processes more complex, because ash sulfation can occur at the same time. Wang et al investigated simultaneous carbonation and sulfation of CaO under oxyfuel CFBC conditions . The results showed that, when the ash containing CaO cooled to the calcination temperature, carbonation of fly ash deposited on cool surfaces occurred.…”
Section: Ash Formation and Deposition
In Oxy-fbcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al also found that, under conditions of oxy-FBC, ash carbonation was faster than sulfation. 111 The ashes generated in a 10 kW th fluidized bed unit using a Victorian brown coal in both air and oxyfuel combustion were characterized. 115 The results showed that the particle size distributions of fly and bed ashes from oxyfuel combustion (15%, 21%, and 30% O 2 ) were similar to those from air combustion.…”
Section: Ash Formation and Deposition In Oxy-fbcmentioning
To alleviate the global warming issue, various CO 2 abatement technologies have been proposed. As one of the leading options for CO 2 capture in power plants mostly firing coal and biomass, the oxyfuel combustion technology has been actively developed for decades. Progress at different stages of the development has been continuously updated in several reviews. However, they usually cover a wide range of topics, which vary significantly in detail. The ash issues are very critical to the design and operation of oxyfuel boilers, but may be one of the most controversial topics. The knowledge is widely scattered in different research articles, and a relatively comprehensive description is not available in the published reviews. Therefore, it is difficult for one to have a clearer picture of this important topic. The present review attempts to provide a more complete understanding. It pays particular attention to experimental data, because they are the basis for model development and full-scale simulation. Different from previous reviews that presented limited information on mineral matter transformation under oxyfuel conditions, this Review summarizes most of the related results reported in the open literature. Data on ash formation and deposition in oxyfuel combustion are also updated. They are organized according to different combustion technologies, i.e., oxyfuel pulverized fuel combustion (oxy-PFC) and oxyfuel fluidized bed combustion (oxy-FBC). By correlating between the three aspects, an in-depth understanding of ash issues in oxyfuel combustion may be achieved. At the end of this Review, key messages regarding mineral matter transformation, ash formation and deposition in oxyfuel combustion, and future research needs are presented.
“…Wang et al investigated simultaneous carbonation and sulfation of CaO under oxyfuel CFBC conditions. 111 The results showed that, when the ash containing CaO cooled calcination temperature, carbonation of fly ash deposited on cool surfaces occurred. Simultaneously, indirect and direct sulfation of limestone would also occur, possibly leading to more deposition.…”
Section: Ash Formation and Deposition In Oxy-fbcmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This was ascribed to the inhibition of sulfation by the high CO 2 partial pressure and the reduction of alkali metals in the fly ash. Wang et al also found that, under conditions of oxy-FBC, ash carbonation was faster than sulfation . The ashes generated in a 10 kW th fluidized bed unit using a Victorian brown coal in both air and oxyfuel combustion were characterized .…”
Section: Ash Formation and Deposition
In Oxy-fbcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of sulfur oxides in the flue gas can make the processes more complex, because ash sulfation can occur at the same time. Wang et al investigated simultaneous carbonation and sulfation of CaO under oxyfuel CFBC conditions . The results showed that, when the ash containing CaO cooled to the calcination temperature, carbonation of fly ash deposited on cool surfaces occurred.…”
Section: Ash Formation and Deposition
In Oxy-fbcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al also found that, under conditions of oxy-FBC, ash carbonation was faster than sulfation. 111 The ashes generated in a 10 kW th fluidized bed unit using a Victorian brown coal in both air and oxyfuel combustion were characterized. 115 The results showed that the particle size distributions of fly and bed ashes from oxyfuel combustion (15%, 21%, and 30% O 2 ) were similar to those from air combustion.…”
Section: Ash Formation and Deposition In Oxy-fbcmentioning
To alleviate the global warming issue, various CO 2 abatement technologies have been proposed. As one of the leading options for CO 2 capture in power plants mostly firing coal and biomass, the oxyfuel combustion technology has been actively developed for decades. Progress at different stages of the development has been continuously updated in several reviews. However, they usually cover a wide range of topics, which vary significantly in detail. The ash issues are very critical to the design and operation of oxyfuel boilers, but may be one of the most controversial topics. The knowledge is widely scattered in different research articles, and a relatively comprehensive description is not available in the published reviews. Therefore, it is difficult for one to have a clearer picture of this important topic. The present review attempts to provide a more complete understanding. It pays particular attention to experimental data, because they are the basis for model development and full-scale simulation. Different from previous reviews that presented limited information on mineral matter transformation under oxyfuel conditions, this Review summarizes most of the related results reported in the open literature. Data on ash formation and deposition in oxyfuel combustion are also updated. They are organized according to different combustion technologies, i.e., oxyfuel pulverized fuel combustion (oxy-PFC) and oxyfuel fluidized bed combustion (oxy-FBC). By correlating between the three aspects, an in-depth understanding of ash issues in oxyfuel combustion may be achieved. At the end of this Review, key messages regarding mineral matter transformation, ash formation and deposition in oxyfuel combustion, and future research needs are presented.
“…Calcination is the first step, then followed by sulfation. The calcination reaction is faster than the sulfation reaction; meanwhile, CO 2 that is produced during calcination could form a Stefan flow that can make sulfation start to occur until the end of calcination, in principle. , In addition, both processes require much time and are greatly affected by the combustion process. , As a result, for a large amount of CaCO 3 and CaO particles, calcination and sulfation are not entirely separate processes: they are stored and recycled in the furnace under different conditions like coal particles. Therefore, the developments of soft sensing models for the desulfurization process have important practical significance.…”
Soft sensing models
of the desulfurization process are developed
in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler that can capture sulfur
dioxide (SO2) with the limestone sorbent in the furnace.
First, calcining utilization of CaCO3 and sulfating utilization
of CaO are proposed by mechanism analysis of the theoretical air and
flue gas, and the online prediction method is achieved by using an
adaptive-tree-structure-based fuzzy inference system (ATSFIS). Second,
condition monitoring models of active CaCO3, active CaO,
and soft sensing model of SO2 emissions are studied by
using the experimental data of a CFB boiler in China, which can monitor
the storage and condition of the limestone in the furnace and predict
SO2 emissions. Finally, a nonlinear proportional–integral–derivative
(PID) control system based on the above models is designed to control
the feed rate of limestone for the reduction of SO2 emissions.
The simulation results show that the soft sensing models are consistent
with the mechanism test results and can accurately predict SO2 emissions. The control system of limestone is also proven
to be effective.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.