2022
DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Bilateral Endoscopic Surgery (SBES): Is It Ready for Prime Time?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we present data on the feasibility of SBES in the prone split-leg position for the first time. Our initial analysis includes 72 cases of SBES in this position, with a bilateral SFR of 70.83%, which is comparable to that reported for supine SBES [8,10,12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, we present data on the feasibility of SBES in the prone split-leg position for the first time. Our initial analysis includes 72 cases of SBES in this position, with a bilateral SFR of 70.83%, which is comparable to that reported for supine SBES [8,10,12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In our study, 15 out of 72 cases developed febrile UTI after surgery and required additional intravenous antibiotics, but no urosepsis occurred. The higher incidence of infectious complications in our analysis, compared to other studies [8,12], may be attributed to the larger stone load and longer operative times in our cohort. Prolonged operation duration has been recognized as a risk factor for postoperative UTI [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…In one of the last works of S. Proietti et al [47] from 2022 focused on simultaneous bilateral ECIRS, a prospective analysis of 101 patients with bilateral nephrolithiasis was conducted. The results of the study showed high efficiency of simultaneous bilateral application of the ECIRS method: SFR = 81.1 %, with the frequency of complications (according to the Clavien-Dindo classification): 7.9 %, 9.9 % and 1.0 % -Grade I, Grade II and Grade III, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bilateral renal stones pose a unique challenge for patients and surgeons alike, and while there are no guidelines on the best approach, in recent times RIRS has made the management of these stones more accessible. In fact, current endourological intervention for kidney stone disease is so advanced that endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery are now considered the forerunners for a tailored and personalized approach in managing such patients [14] , [15] . However, large-volume multicenter real-world data are lacking on how bilateral surgical intervention by RIRS impacts SFR and surgical complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, in some circumstances, we decided to stop surgery earlier due to concerns for sepsis or prolonged operation time. Therefore, judicious use of the surgical time is one of the cornerstones of a safe SSB-RIRS, and in the presence of preoperative predictors of prolonged surgical time (eg, bilateral and large stone burden, and anomalous kidneys), staged procedures or a simultaneous RIRS on one side and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy on the other side [15] should be planned to minimize morbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%