Simultaneous beam sampling and aperture shape optimization for SPORT

Abstract

Purpose: Station parameter optimized radiation therapy (SPORT) was recently proposed to fully utilize the technical capability of emerging digital linear accelerators, in which the station parameters of a delivery system, such as aperture shape and weight, couch position/angle, gantry/collimator angle, can be optimized simultaneously. SPORT promises to deliver remarkable radiation dose distributions in an efficient manner, yet there exists no optimization algorithm for its implementation. The purpose of this work is to develop an algorithm to simultaneously optimize the beam sampling and aperture shapes. Methods: The authors build a mathematical model with the fundamental station point parameters as the decision variables. To solve the resulting large-scale optimization problem, the authors devise an effective algorithm by integrating three advanced optimization techniques: column generation, subgradient method, and pattern search. Column generation adds the most beneficial stations sequentially until the plan quality improvement saturates and provides a good starting point for the subsequent optimization. It also adds the new stations during the algorithm if beneficial. For each update resulted from column generation, the subgradient method improves the selected stations locally by reshaping the apertures and updating the beam angles toward a descent subgradient direction. The algorithm continues to improve the selected stations locally and globally by a pattern search algorithm to explore the part of search space not reachable by the subgradient method. By combining these three techniques together, all plausible combinations of station parameters are searched efficiently to yield the optimal solution. Results: A SPORT optimization framework with seamlessly integration of three complementary algorithms, column generation, subgradient method, and pattern search, was established. The proposed technique was applied to two previously treated clinical cases: a head and neck and a prostate case. It significantly improved the target conformality and at the same time critical structure sparing compared with conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In the head and neck case, for example, the average PTV coverage D99% for two PTVs, cord and brainstem max doses, and right parotid gland mean dose were improved, respectively, by about 7%, 37%, 12%, and 16%. Conclusions: The proposed method automatically determines the number of the stations required to generate a satisfactory plan and optimizes simultaneously the involved station parameters, leading to improved quality of the resultant treatment plans as compared with the conventional IMRT plans. C 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx

Optimizing fiducial visibility on periodically acquired megavoltage and kilovoltage image pairs during prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy

“…Furthermore, we may wish to explore scenarios that do not necessarily acquire images at a fixed interval, but rather at control points where the motion sensitivities are peak and monitoring is the most relevant. Since imaging strategy and plan optimization mutually affects each other, a more powerful optimization framework that truly combines imaging and delivery such as station parameter optimized radiation therapy (SPORT) 20,21 is the ultimate answer, and the goal of our future development.…”

Development of an autonomous treatment planning strategy for radiation therapy with effective use of population‐based prior data

“…In this study, we divide the DVH curve of each structure into segments and the j‐th dosimetric characteristic variable of structure is simply the j‐th DVH segment of the structure. Note that the prior knowledge or the library of reference plans sets our preferred variation range of the dosmetric quantity , which is similar to the use of prior data to set expectations for the planning process in previous studies . Also note that the first constraint in (1) requires that plan should be the output of the optimization problem in the TPS, which serves as a lower level minimization problem embedded within the bi‐level model framework.…”

“…The parameters are then used as input of subsequent inverse planning. The method has recently been applied to predict the weighting factors and the prescription DVHs needed for driving an inverse planning calculation. We emphasize that all these approaches only use prior knowledge‐derived parameters (i.e., either weighting or prescription or both) to “warm start” the inverse planning, instead of using them to guide the plan search throughout the optimization process.…”

Application programming in C# environment with recorded user software interactions and its application in autopilot of VMAT/IMRT treatment planning

“…The iterative interactions of the decision function and TPS pilots the search toward a clinically sensible solution. From the perspective of optimization, the strategy here is similar to a sequential optimization of an overall objective, 14 , 15 but the objective functions for the two stages (i.e., the TPS optimization and the outer‐loop determination of the TPS parameters) are different. This process is along the line of our earlier work in automated weighting factors and model parameters determination 6 , 16 , 17 .…”