2011
DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Bayesian Inference for Linear, Nonlinear and Semiparametric Mixed-Effects Models with Skew-Normality and Measurement Errors in Covariates

Abstract: In recent years, various mixed-effects models have been suggested for estimating viral decay rates in HIV dynamic models for complex longitudinal data. Among those models are linear mixed-effects (LME), nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME), and semiparametric nonlinear mixedeffects (SNLME) models. However, a critical question is whether these models produce coherent estimates of viral decay rates, and if not, which model is appropriate and should be used in practice. In addition, one often assumes that a model rando… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…growth curves [1], hormone level profiles [2], drug concentration profiles [3], antigen trajectories [4], and viral load profiles [5][6][7]. Other curves can be those formed by a physical structure, such as the dorsal funiculus, the white substance of the spinal cord that forms a characteristic nonlinear curve over the length of the spinal cord.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…growth curves [1], hormone level profiles [2], drug concentration profiles [3], antigen trajectories [4], and viral load profiles [5][6][7]. Other curves can be those formed by a physical structure, such as the dorsal funiculus, the white substance of the spinal cord that forms a characteristic nonlinear curve over the length of the spinal cord.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Huang et al. 5 compared linear and biphasic nonlinear modelling performance and found that linear modelling may result in misleading conclusions because one has to truncate the data. However, it is not clear where the data should be truncated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%