Purpose:To investigate whether estimates of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) in brain tumors, obtained by using dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging vary with choice of data acquisition and postprocessing methods.
Materials and Methods:Four acquisition methods were used to collect data in 22 highgrade glioma patients, with informed written consent under HIPAA-compliant guidelines approved by the institutional review board. During bolus administration of a standard single dose of gadolinium-based contrast agent (0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight), one of three acquisition methods was used: gradient-echo (GRE) echo-planar imaging (echo time [TE], 30 msec; flip angle, 90°; n ϭ 10), small-flip-angle GRE echo-planar imaging (TE, 54 msec; flip angle, 35°; n ϭ 7), or dual-echo GRE spiral-out imaging (TE, 3.3 and 30 msec; flip angle, 72°; n ϭ 5). Next, GRE echo-planar imaging (TE, 30 msec; flip angle, 90°; n ϭ 22) was used to collect data during administration of a second dose of contrast agent (0.2 mmol/ kg). Subsequently, six methods of analysis were used to calculate rCBV. Mean rCBV values from whole tumor, tumor hot spots, and contralateral brain were normalized to mean rCBV in normal-appearing white matter.
Results:Friedman two-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis oneway analysis of variance results indicated that qualitative rCBV values were dependent on acquisition and postprocessing methods for both tumor and contralateral brain. By using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test, a consistently positive (greater than zero) tumor-contralateral brain rCBV ratio resulted when either the preload-postprocessing correction approach or dualecho acquisition approach (P Ͻ .008 for both methods) was used.
Conclusion:The dependence of tumor rCBV on the choice of acquisition and postprocessing methods is caused by their varying sensitivities to T1 and T2 and/or T2* leakage effects. The preloadcorrection approach and dual-echo acquisition approach are the most robust choices for the evaluation of brain tumors when the possibility of contrast agent extravasation exists. RSNA, 2008 Note: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, use the Radiology Reprints form at the end of this article.
In 1990, Rosen et al (1) demonstrated that if a bolus of a gadolinium-chelated contrast agent is administered and images of the brain are acquired during this administration, a transient decrease in signal intensity occurs. This approach is based on the principle of susceptibilityweighted contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, for which a bolus of a gadolinium-chelated contrast agent that is confined to the vasculature induces a difference in susceptibility between the vessel and the tissue. This signal intensity decrease can be converted into a concentration-time curve (⌬R2*[t]), from which cerebral blood volume can be computed for each image voxel, resulting...