2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous arsenic and fluoride removal from synthetic and real groundwater by electrocoagulation process: Parametric and cost evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 . To observe the energy consumption and operating cost throughout the experiments following equations were adapted from literature [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] and the results are tabulated in Table 3 . …”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 . To observe the energy consumption and operating cost throughout the experiments following equations were adapted from literature [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] and the results are tabulated in Table 3 . …”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each of these methods presents its drawbacks, such as a long disposal time, the use of dangerous and expensive reagents 49 . Among these methods, adsorption is mentioned as the most efficient and widely used fundamental approach in water defluoridation processes 50 . It is characterized by its simplicity and availability of a wide variety of adsorbents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of industrial enterprises are involved in F-containing wastewater generation, and a large amount of F-containing wastewater is exported every year [11][12][13][14]. The fluoride concentration in industrial wastewater generally reaches up to hundreds or even thousands of milligrams of per liter and exceeds drastically the WHO (World Health Organization) guideline value of 1.5 mg/L in drinking water [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%