2021
DOI: 10.1002/2050-7038.12992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous allocation of photovoltaic DG and DSTATCOM for techno‐economic and environmental benefits in electrical distribution systems at different loading conditions using novel hybrid optimization algorithms

Abstract: Summary Enhancing distribution system operation accomplished with the integration of renewable energy resources (RERs) has several technical, economical, and environmental dimensions. In this regard, this paper presents an optimal integration procedure of Distributed Generation (DG) based on Photovoltaic panel (PV) and Distribution Static Compensator (DSTATCOM) in Electrical Distribution System (EDS). The proposed procedure is formulated as a multi‐objective function (MOF). The considered objectives that refle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been noticed that the best performance of PSO is when c 1 is changing in a descending manner while c 2 is changing in ascending manner, and generally this change is between 0 and 2.5 over the full course of iterations. There are various time-varying updating strategies to determine c 1 and c 2 [34]. The formula used in this paper is given in Equations ( 24) and ( 25) as follows:…”
Section: The Proposed Hybrid Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been noticed that the best performance of PSO is when c 1 is changing in a descending manner while c 2 is changing in ascending manner, and generally this change is between 0 and 2.5 over the full course of iterations. There are various time-varying updating strategies to determine c 1 and c 2 [34]. The formula used in this paper is given in Equations ( 24) and ( 25) as follows:…”
Section: The Proposed Hybrid Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. IEEE 33_bus with three SVC and three DG HFPSO [3] PSO [23] MOPSO [7] BFOA [8] Proposed Method Size in KVAR @bus 390 @12 214.2 @18 524.9 @2 400 @12 370 @13 Size in KVAR @bus 650 @24 375.6 @25 512.3 @11 350 @25 430 @24 Size in KVAR @bus 840 @30 1450.3@30 619.7 @30 850 @30 1080 @29 Size in KW @bus 880 @12 831 @3 720.5 @12 850 @12 730 @14 Size in KW @bus 870 @24 904.7 @14 465.67 @15 750 @25 1010 @24 Size in KW @bus 1030 @30 971.2 @30 1016.2 @28 860 @30 1300 @29 The total real losses are reduced to 58.494KW after utilizing a single SVC and DG. The proposed method determined the optimal location of SVC at bus 30 with size 1260KVAR and the optimal location of DG is obtained at bus 6 with size 2590KW.…”
Section: Case 1: Ieee 33_bus With Only One Svcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic of optimal DG integration has been discussed in a number of studies from various perspectives. The firefly algorithm (FA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) method were presented in [9] to achieve techno-economic and environmental benefits in electrical distribution networks. A PSO and hybrid enhanced gray wolf optimizer (EGWO-PSO) approach was presented in [10] for the optimal DG allocation in order to reduce system costs, emissions, active power losses, and voltage deviation index (VDI), as well as increase voltage stability index (VSI).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%