2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous absorption of SO2 and NOx with pyrolusite slurry combined with gas-phase oxidation of NO using ozone: Effect of molar ratio of O2/(SO2+0.5NOx) in flue gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of Mn leaching reaction was elaborated by shrinking core with an product layer when the reductant agent was aqueous SO 2 , which implicates that the rate-controlled stage is SO 2 diffusion from bulk phase into porous structure of ore particles and the apparent rate constant was estimated 2.5-4.2×10 −2 min −1 (Raisoni and Dixit, 1988). The sphere diffusion controlled without an inert product layer for Mn extraction with Flue gas (this study) is can attributed to the diffusion rate of SO 2 from gas phase into liquid phase (Sun et al, 2013). The fact that rate constant of 3.4×10 −3 min −1 obtained in this study is smaller compered to 2.5-4.2×10 −2 also confirmed the Mn dissolution mechanism.…”
Section: Separation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rate of Mn leaching reaction was elaborated by shrinking core with an product layer when the reductant agent was aqueous SO 2 , which implicates that the rate-controlled stage is SO 2 diffusion from bulk phase into porous structure of ore particles and the apparent rate constant was estimated 2.5-4.2×10 −2 min −1 (Raisoni and Dixit, 1988). The sphere diffusion controlled without an inert product layer for Mn extraction with Flue gas (this study) is can attributed to the diffusion rate of SO 2 from gas phase into liquid phase (Sun et al, 2013). The fact that rate constant of 3.4×10 −3 min −1 obtained in this study is smaller compered to 2.5-4.2×10 −2 also confirmed the Mn dissolution mechanism.…”
Section: Separation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Our previous studies show that the high efficiencies of desulphurization and manganese extraction can be attained when low-grade manganese ore was used as absorbent to remove SO 2 in flue gas (Sun et al, 2011;Sun et al, 2013); however, it takes a long time to obtain more than 90% manganese, requiring more than 15 h, which is due to low content of SO 2 in flue gas (below 1% SO 2 ). In this work, simulated flue gas (high concentration of SO 2 contained) was taken to reduce the high-iron pyrolusite ore to simultaneously investigate the leaching behavior of manganese and iron and separation efficiency of manganese from iron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization process, a great amount of air is needed to oxidize (NH4) 2 SO 3 and NH 4 HSO 3 into (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , the byproduct. The possible reason is that an appropriate increase in initial NO concentration promotes the reaction between NO 2 and SO 3 2-, but the increase of desulfurization efficiency is very limited, which indicates the reactions (11)- (12) are the main reactions for SO 2 removal. Figure 4 shows the effect of initial NO concentration on the ozonation process.…”
Section: Influence Of O 3 /No Molar Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pollutants have brought about significant effects on both the environment and human health in China [1,2]. To overcome this problem, many technologies such as nonthermal plasma, electron beam irradiation [3][4][5] and adsorption process [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] have been developed for simultaneous removal of SO 2 and NO x , but only few commercial applications have been reported until now. However, the individual treatment technology may lead to high investment and operating costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al . used pyrolusite slurry to remove SO 2 and NO x simultaneously, which could achieve the goal of manganese leaching as well and sulfur reuse. In this technology, however, NO needs to be oxidized by ozone first when the flue gas is injected in the slurry tank, which makes the system complicated and the investment and operating costs are very high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%