Simulator Verification Is Potentially Beneficial for the Fitting of Softband Bone Conduction Hearing Devices in Young Children

Abstract

Hypothesis The current study employed a skull-simulator verification method to assess whether the output of softband bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs) at the manufacturer's default settings deviated widely from the target determined by the fitting formula. Background Real ear analysis is utilized for the verification of the fitting of air conduction hearing devices (ACHDs) in a variety of institutions. This procedure, however, has not been used in the fitting of BCHDs, largely due to the difficulty of testing the output of these devices to temporal bones. Despite the availability of skull simulators, they have not been utilized clinically to measure BCHD output. Materials and Methods This prospective, single-center study enrolled 42 subjects, aged 3 months to 10 years, with microtia-atresia–associated mild-to-severe bilateral conductive hearing loss. Hearing sensitivity was evaluated behaviorally by pure tone audiometry (PTA) in 22 subjects 4 years or older (the PTA group), and by auditory brainstem response (ABR) in 20 subjects younger than 4 years (the ABR group). Following 6 months of subjects wearing the prescribed softband BCHDs, their dial level (DL) thresholds were reassessed while using their own BCHDs, configured with zero gain across all frequencies, functioning solely as a bone vibrator. These DL thresholds were inputted into the fitting formula, desired sensation level–bone conduction devices (DSL-BCD) for children, to obtain the target values of BCHD output. The simulator output of the BCHD programmed at the manufacturer's default setting was measured in response to speech presented at 55, 65, and 80 dB SPL, followed by gain adjustment based on the differences between the simulator output and the target. Aided speech intelligibility index (SII) was measured before and after the gain adjustment. Results The softband BCHDs at the manufacturer's settings generally had lower output than the prescribed target values. This difference was larger at low frequencies and low levels. Across the 12 points tested (four frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz multiplied by three levels), 22 (52.3%) and 42 (100%) BCHDs had deviations of +7 and +5 dB, respectively, at one point or more. The gain adjustments reduced the deviation and improved the SII values at the two lower levels of speech presented. Conclusion The simulator output of softband bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs) with the manufacturer's settings may exhibit significant deviations from the formula. Objective output verification should be considered a beneficial step in BCHD fitting and is recommended when applicable.