2020
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulative Minimization of Mass Transfer Limitations Within Hydrogel-Based 3D-Printed Enzyme Carriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already mentioned, there has been a need for developing 3D printed hydrogels with smaller and finer structures to reduce mass transfer limitations and improve the effectiveness factor of entrapped fast-acting enzymes [ 85 ]. Lahann and co-workers [ 80 ] developed a new 3D printing technique named “3D jet writing” to create micro-sized polymer hydrogel fibers oriented in a self-supporting 3D scaffold.…”
Section: Immobilization By Physical Entrapment During 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already mentioned, there has been a need for developing 3D printed hydrogels with smaller and finer structures to reduce mass transfer limitations and improve the effectiveness factor of entrapped fast-acting enzymes [ 85 ]. Lahann and co-workers [ 80 ] developed a new 3D printing technique named “3D jet writing” to create micro-sized polymer hydrogel fibers oriented in a self-supporting 3D scaffold.…”
Section: Immobilization By Physical Entrapment During 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scope of this review focused only on studies that directly immobilized enzymes on or in the 3D printed objects and does not include many other innovations that use 3D printing to make customizable tools and devices, such as labware [ 88 ], mass spectrometry microcolumns [ 89 ], and biomedical devices [ 90 ], where enzymes are not directly included. The review emphasized the most recent techniques and chemistry for achieving successful enzyme immobilization by 3D printing, especially by gelation mechanisms that favor high retention of enzyme activity and longevity; however, the reader is referred elsewhere for more information on the basic physics of mass transfer limitations that may occur in these systems and how they are currently being studied through modeling [ 85 ].…”
Section: Limitation Of the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the application of the scaffolds, differing strand diameters have a huge impact on the scaffold geometry as well as the diffusive distances in the strands. [36,37] If uniform extrusion is achieved, the stackability of the ink is high (see Figure 3C and D). To ensure continuous material extrusion two strategies were used for GelMA.…”
Section: Materials Printing Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One would expect that the restricted diffusion together with deactivation of a fraction of the enzymes due to the coupling chemistry would decrease the efficiency. [31,32] This counter intuitive result may be the result of the increased buffering effect of the CS polymer, maintaining better control of pH during the reaction as compared to the case of Urs in solution. In the absence of CS, the pH was observed to increase from 5.5 to 9 at the end of the reaction, while the presence of CS controlled the pH such that it increased from 5.5 to 6.5 (Figure S5a).…”
Section: Monitoring Enzyme Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%