2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16691.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations on high-z long gamma-ray burst rate

Abstract: Since the launch of Swift satellite, the detections of high‐z (z > 4) long gamma‐ray bursts (LGRBs) have been rapidly growing, even approaching the very early Universe (the record holder currently is z= 8.3). The observed high‐z LGRB rate shows significant excess over that estimated from the star formation history. We investigate what may be responsible for this high productivity of GRBs at high‐z through Monte Carlo simulations, with effective Swift/Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) trigger and redshift detection p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6. There is increasing evidence for an enhanced LGRB rate at z > 3 ( Daigne et al 2006;Kistler et al 2008;Wanderman & Piran 2010;Qin et al 2010), as expected from the increase in the specific star formation rate (SFR) with decreasing metallicity (Mannucci et al 2010). …”
Section: Formation Rate Of Stellar Black Holes As a Function Of Metalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6. There is increasing evidence for an enhanced LGRB rate at z > 3 ( Daigne et al 2006;Kistler et al 2008;Wanderman & Piran 2010;Qin et al 2010), as expected from the increase in the specific star formation rate (SFR) with decreasing metallicity (Mannucci et al 2010). …”
Section: Formation Rate Of Stellar Black Holes As a Function Of Metalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another possibility that could explain the excess of events at high redshift is to assume that the efficiency of massive stars of forming GRBs increases with redshift. A variable efficiency of forming GRBs could be an effect due to the metallicity of the environment (Daigne et al 2006;Salvaterra & Chincarini 2007;Qin et al 2010;Cao et al 2011;Virgili et al 2011). If one accepts that LGRBs are formed preferentially in a metal-poor medium, the association of (at least a fraction of them) with type Ibc supernovae is difficult to understand since SNIbc preferentially occur in galaxies with high metallicity (Prantzos & Boissier 2003;Prieto et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, D com is the co-moving distance, η grb is the probability of stars resulting in a LGRB and then detected by an instrument, and δ is the power of proportionality for the CSFH to LGRBR (see e.g., Bromm & Loeb 2006;Daigne et al 2006;Young & Fryer 2007;Wolf & Podsiadlowski 2007;Salvaterra & Chincarini 2007;Kistler et al 2009;Campisi et al 2010;Qin et al 2010;Butler et al 2010;Wanderman & Piran 2010;Belczynski et al 2010;Virgili et al 2011;de Souza et al 2011;Wang & Dai 2011;Ishida et al 2011). The LGRB probability can be parameterised as (explained similarly in Bromm & Loeb 2006):…”
Section: Long Gamma-ray Burst Ratementioning
confidence: 99%