2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp01003k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of valence excited states in coordination complexes reached through hard X-ray scattering

Abstract: Theoretical guide to the valence electronic structure information that can be extracted from hard X-ray scattering experiments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of restricted active space second-order perturbation theory (RASPT2), both core and valence excitations can be treated with quantitative accuracy. Unfortunately, one is still limited by the computational cost of this approach. Less computationally demanding single-reference methods, such as time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT), do not provide a satisfactory description of the nonadiabatic dynamics among the valence electronic states . State-specific methods, such as Δ self-consistent field (ΔSCF) , and restricted open-shell Kohn–Sham (ROKS), , may be more accurate than TD-DFT for core-excitation energies but fail to describe conical intersections between any pair of electronic states and are therefore unsuitable for applications to nonadiabatic dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of restricted active space second-order perturbation theory (RASPT2), both core and valence excitations can be treated with quantitative accuracy. Unfortunately, one is still limited by the computational cost of this approach. Less computationally demanding single-reference methods, such as time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT), do not provide a satisfactory description of the nonadiabatic dynamics among the valence electronic states . State-specific methods, such as Δ self-consistent field (ΔSCF) , and restricted open-shell Kohn–Sham (ROKS), , may be more accurate than TD-DFT for core-excitation energies but fail to describe conical intersections between any pair of electronic states and are therefore unsuitable for applications to nonadiabatic dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approximation fails, e.g., for high-energy photons that have short wavelengths. In , this was originally addressed through a complete second-order multipole expansion, which was then applied to high-energy X-ray absorption and scattering processes. However, the multipole expansion itself does not necessarily have a smooth convergence behavior toward the exact result, and is not origin independent unless using the correct length and velocity gauges. , In contrast, the plane-waveform of the wave vector, i.e., the exact semiclassical light–matter interaction operator, shows excellent stability also for small basis sets. , In , the operator has been implemented using the Gauss–Hermite quadrature, which makes it easy to implement both isotropic averages and defined directions of wave and polarization vectors. , This implementation has also been extended to circularly polarized light, allowing the computation of rotatory strengths and tensors beyond the dipole approximation …”
Section: Electronic Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K-edge X-ray emission simulations with RAS could previously only be performed for centrosymmetic complexes where excitations from s and p orbitals resulted in gerade and ungerade states respectively. 65,66 Here we use a projection operator, similar to the core-valence separation (CVS) technique, 67 to remove unwanted configurations with doubly occupied 1s and/or 3p orbitals. 68 Still, to ensure that the hole stays in the targeted orbitals, 1s and 3p orbitals were kept frozen in RASSCF optimizations.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%