Molecular Dynamics - Studies of Synthetic and Biological Macromolecules 2012
DOI: 10.5772/36246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of Unusual Properties of Water Inside Carbon Nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no compelling proof that the alteration of surface material can modify the structure and dynamics of confined water and hence water transport. , Whether the observed structure of confined water is peculiar to carbon materials is however yet to be investigated. The observed structuring of confined water is seen to be diameter dependent and is independent of water model. ,, Studies of Nakamura et al demonstrated that depending on CNT diameter size, all the water models commonly show the peculiar behavior during confinement. It was shown that the impact of water model on unusual behavior of confined water is quite significant for CNT diameter range of ∼1.1–1.2 nm, beyond that no considerable change due to differential water models was noticed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no compelling proof that the alteration of surface material can modify the structure and dynamics of confined water and hence water transport. , Whether the observed structure of confined water is peculiar to carbon materials is however yet to be investigated. The observed structuring of confined water is seen to be diameter dependent and is independent of water model. ,, Studies of Nakamura et al demonstrated that depending on CNT diameter size, all the water models commonly show the peculiar behavior during confinement. It was shown that the impact of water model on unusual behavior of confined water is quite significant for CNT diameter range of ∼1.1–1.2 nm, beyond that no considerable change due to differential water models was noticed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The observed structuring of confined water is seen to be diameter dependent and is independent of water model. 41,58,59 Studies of Nakamura et al 58 demonstrated that depending on CNT diameter size, all the water models commonly show the peculiar behavior during confinement. It was shown that the impact of water model on unusual behavior of confined water is quite significant for CNT diameter range of ∼1.1−1.2 nm, beyond that no considerable change due to differential water models was noticed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the observed freezing of water inside nanotubes is perceived to be diameter-dependent, it has been found to be independent of the water model. 68,69 The earlier studies by Nakamura et al 69 demonstrated that, in general, all of the water models show freezing behavior under confinement inside nanotubes with critical diameters of ∼1.1−1.2 nm; however, the precise structure of frozen water may vary depending on the water model. The detailed study on the effect of the water model can be referred from the earlier studies by Mejri et al 68 and others.…”
Section: Acs Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the aforementioned temporal variation of water intercalation, there is also a spatial component to the wetting process of CNTs. The hydrophobic nature of the CNT wall causes water to first fill the center of the tube and only then (as the water density increases) it starts filling the near-wall region [ 115 ]. This is the exact opposite to the filling process of water in hydrophilic materials, such as MCM-41 [ 116 , 117 ].…”
Section: Intercalation Of Water In Cntsmentioning
confidence: 99%