2009
DOI: 10.1175/2009jcli3138.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of the 2004 North American Monsoon: NAMAP2

Abstract: The second phase of the North American Monsoon Experiment (NAME) Model Assessment Project (NAMAP2) was carried out to provide a coordinated set of simulations from global and regional models of the 2004 warm season across the North American monsoon domain. This project follows an earlier assessment, called NAMAP, that preceded the 2004 field season of the North American Monsoon Experiment. Six global and four regional models are all forced with prescribed, time-varying ocean surface temperatures. Metrics for m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monsoon onset occurs in June in most of western Mexico south of ∼30 • N and reaches the international border and then the southwestern US in July and August. Rainfall intensifies strongly and rapidly in July, with maximum rainfall rates along the western foothills of the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) in northwestern Mexico, consistent with previous studies (e.g., Gutzler, 2009). Although, TRMM observes the spatial variability of the NAM precipitation, it underestimates the NAM precipitation compared to the PERSIANN data.…”
Section: Modeling Dust and Its Radiative Forcingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Monsoon onset occurs in June in most of western Mexico south of ∼30 • N and reaches the international border and then the southwestern US in July and August. Rainfall intensifies strongly and rapidly in July, with maximum rainfall rates along the western foothills of the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) in northwestern Mexico, consistent with previous studies (e.g., Gutzler, 2009). Although, TRMM observes the spatial variability of the NAM precipitation, it underestimates the NAM precipitation compared to the PERSIANN data.…”
Section: Modeling Dust and Its Radiative Forcingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Here, the Noah with multi-parameterization (Noah-MP, Niu et al, 2011) land surface scheme is adopted to simulate water and energy fluxes in each two-way nested domain (Fig. 1, Table II) of 12, 4 and 1 km cell resolution, with the domains determined in a manner consistent with NAME modeling efforts (e.g., Gutzler et al, 2009). …”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better assess the performance of CRCM5 in simulating NAM and compare simulation results with observations, two small subdomains, located in the NAM area, are studied: the CORE subdomain, covering parts of Baja California peninsula and Gulf of California coast, and the AZNM subdomain, covering parts of Arizona and New Mexico states (Gutzler et al 2009). The CORE subdomain is located in the centre of NAM-influenced area, while the AZNM subdomain is at its northern limit.…”
Section: North American Monsoonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulated winter precipitation maximum is notably higher Fig. 19 The map of subregions in the North American Monsoon zone: AZNM and CORE subregions (Gutzler et al 2009). Actual simulation grid tiles within these subregions are presented than that in the CRU TS3.1 and UDel data.…”
Section: North American Monsoonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation