29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-3972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of Separated Flow around an Airfoil with Ice Shape using Hybrid RANS/LES Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also found a strong effect (with a variance of 95%) of the spanwise variation in the geometry on lift coefficients for angle of attack in the range 5 o − 15 o . In a recent review paper, Stebbins et al [49] made a comprehensive assessment of RANS [50,51,52] and HRL methods [53,54,55] in the study of horn geometry and concluded that the results of HRL methods are more accurate than RANS solutions, particularly at high angles of attack, owing to the ability of LES-based methods to capture the unsteadiness of the flow. Still, they displayed discrepancies with the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also found a strong effect (with a variance of 95%) of the spanwise variation in the geometry on lift coefficients for angle of attack in the range 5 o − 15 o . In a recent review paper, Stebbins et al [49] made a comprehensive assessment of RANS [50,51,52] and HRL methods [53,54,55] in the study of horn geometry and concluded that the results of HRL methods are more accurate than RANS solutions, particularly at high angles of attack, owing to the ability of LES-based methods to capture the unsteadiness of the flow. Still, they displayed discrepancies with the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the capability of the Direct Numerical Simulation to obtain the resolution of the space and time scales, it requires enormous computing capability [24]. Thus, it is too costly for users [25]. Likewise, large eddy simulation is computationally expensive for complex unsteady phenomena because of the 3D nature of the eddies [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is too costly for users [25]. Likewise, large eddy simulation is computationally expensive for complex unsteady phenomena because of the 3D nature of the eddies [24,25]. However, CFD solutions that are feasible and economical for low-Reynolds-number flows are rare [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%