2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00397-005-0016-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of magnetorheological suspensions in Poiseuille flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, an understanding of the microstructures that form is crucial to predicting the mechanical performance of devices utilizing ER fluids. In shear mode, shear-induced lamellar structures are known to form, while in flow mode, the suspension microstructure tends to contain clusters and aggregates [7][8][9]. In addition, an enhancement in the shear yield strength has been shown in magnetorheological fluids as the fluid is compressed in the direction orthogonal to shear [10] and a strengthening of the microstructure of ER fluids has also been shown in squeeze mode by Tian et al [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, an understanding of the microstructures that form is crucial to predicting the mechanical performance of devices utilizing ER fluids. In shear mode, shear-induced lamellar structures are known to form, while in flow mode, the suspension microstructure tends to contain clusters and aggregates [7][8][9]. In addition, an enhancement in the shear yield strength has been shown in magnetorheological fluids as the fluid is compressed in the direction orthogonal to shear [10] and a strengthening of the microstructure of ER fluids has also been shown in squeeze mode by Tian et al [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For the calculation of hydrodynamic forces both Pappas and Klingenberg [37] and Lindner et al [39] use a Stokes drag term that is included in the DEM calculation. In contrast, Han et al [36] use an LBM-DEM framework similar to that described in Sects.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Suspensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first, and the one utilised for this study, is the particles carrying a charge and thus interacting with the electromagnetic field via the Lorentz force equation [33][34][35]. The second, is to model particles of a magnetisable material that, upon application of an electromagnetic field, experiences a force between particles due to magnetic dipole interactions [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Of Charged Particles In Electromagnetic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main two differences from the model used in [4] are: 1) the use of a more accurate description of hydrodynamic interactions between neighbor particles and 2) the shear flow being studied instead of a plane Poiseuille flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pappas and Klingenberg [4] explain the processes inside a MR suspension by direct numerical simulation as a tool for studies of particle systems in a fluid flow the hydrodynamic interactions being limited to the Stokes drag and hydrodynamic interaction between nearly contacting particles neglected. Magnetized particles are represented by constant point-like magnetic dipoles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%