Optical Microlithography XVIII 2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.601497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of immersion lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11][12]), in which the kernel functions are quite restrictive and are required to have compact supports in general. In the following we study the Hopkins equation in the spatial domain, which allows a larger class of kernel functions in applications.…”
Section: Extending Hopkins Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[9][10][11][12]), in which the kernel functions are quite restrictive and are required to have compact supports in general. In the following we study the Hopkins equation in the spatial domain, which allows a larger class of kernel functions in applications.…”
Section: Extending Hopkins Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, a polarized light source can be decomposed and calculated in this form, if we properly choose for s i 's the x-, y-components of the vector field defined by a polarized source and choose for p i ; q i the components of the transfer matrix of an imaging system (see [11] for the definition). It is important to point out that a Hermitian kernel given in this summation form is positive definite if it represents the extended Hopkins equation in vector form.…”
Section: Extending Hopkins Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not only are Hopkins's kernels semi-positive definite operators in a Hilbert space, but such linear combinations as representations of vector forms of the Hopkins equation are as well. The extension of the Hopkins equation to the vector case is usually done in the frequency domain (e.g., [7], [3], [6], [1] where p 's are functions defined in the frequency domain, (x, y, z) in the sub-indexes mean the x, y, z components of an electric field in the exit pupil, and (X, Y) mean the x, y components of an electric field in the entrance pupil. Here, we neglected the z-component of a field in the entrance pupil because of the reduction factor four of a projection system commonly used nowadays.…”
Section: Vector Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To model these hyper-NA systems, current state-of-the-art OPC modeling engines are already capable of modeling thin-film energy coupling, vector diffraction, polarization illumination, and immersion, imaging. [1][2][3] However, current OPC simulators * do not consider the loss of spatial frequency content due to pupil apodization or pellicle film effects. Both of these effects cause a loss of critical high-spatial-frequency information in the imaging process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%