2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of CO 2 storage in aquifer models with top surface morphology and transition zones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the amount of dissolved CO2 in brine for 0.01 is lower than the ratio of 1 before the injection stops and then increases after shut-in. Since the results we achieved are not in agreement with the results by former researchers for pre-shut-in duration [24], (Fig. 8).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the amount of dissolved CO2 in brine for 0.01 is lower than the ratio of 1 before the injection stops and then increases after shut-in. Since the results we achieved are not in agreement with the results by former researchers for pre-shut-in duration [24], (Fig. 8).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, in deeper aquifers both temperature and the salinity increase and thus the dissolution of CO2 in formation brine decreases. However, it should be noted that aquifers with greater depth are considered to be interesting sinks for CO2 storage because they are safer and the geothermal energy can be also utilized alongside the CCS [22,23,24]. One of the main objectives of this study is to determine the CO2 storage efficiency that is known to be dependent on different factors which can be categorised as: 1) Characteristics of the target aquifer for storage such as porosity, permeability, temperature, pressure, etc; 2) Characteristics of CO2 storage operation such as injection rate, number of wells, etc; 3) Constraints used in the injection process, such as maximum bottom hole pressure and the definitions used to calculate the volume of rock which is considered for CO2 storage [25].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMG, which overlies potential CO2 storage formations such as the Sherwood Sandstone Group and its North Sea equivalent, the Bunter Sandstone Formation (Noy et al, 2012;Williams et al, 2018), equally serves as a good example here. At the reservoir/seal interface, transitional lithologies commonly exist between the Sherwood Sandstone and the Mercia Mudstone (Newell and Shariatipour, 2016;Seedhouse and Racey, 1997;Shariatipour et al, 2016b). This lithology is characterised by interbedded claystone, siltstones and medium-to fine-grained sandstones of approximately equal proportions (Hobbs et al, 2002).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquifer permeability and formation dip were shown to be the main parameters affecting the storage efficiency 57 . Later in another study, 58 the effect of tilt, rugosity and permeability anisotropy on CO 2 storage migration and trapping in a saline aquifer was investigated. The effect of the domain between the aquifer and the caprock (transition zone) on the CO 2 dissolution and movement was considered in the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%