2015
DOI: 10.3189/2015aog70a113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of changes to Glaciar Zongo, Bolivia (16° S), over the 21st century using a 3-D full-Stokes model and CMIP5 climate projections

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Bolivian glaciers are an essential source of fresh water for the Altiplano, and any changes they may undergo in the near future due to ongoing climate change are of particular concern. Glaciar Zongo, Bolivia, located near the administrative capital La Paz, has been extensively monitored by the GLACIOCLIM observatory in the last two decades. Here we model the glacier dynamics using the 3-D full-Stokes model Elmer/Ice. The model was calibrated and validated over a recent period (1997-2010) using four i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results indicate a decrease in annual and dry season discharge of 25 and 57% respectively by the end of the 21st century, resulting from a loss of 81% of the glacier volume (in scenario RCP4.5, when compared to reference year 1987), which would render future glacier melt contribution negligible. This reduction is significantly more than the volume loss of only 69% in the higher emission scenario RCP6.0 found by Réveillet et al (2015), highlighting the uncertainty in future projections of glacier loss associated with different methodologies, input parameters and assumptions concerning the different climate scenarios.…”
Section: Hydrologic (Water Supply-side) Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Their results indicate a decrease in annual and dry season discharge of 25 and 57% respectively by the end of the 21st century, resulting from a loss of 81% of the glacier volume (in scenario RCP4.5, when compared to reference year 1987), which would render future glacier melt contribution negligible. This reduction is significantly more than the volume loss of only 69% in the higher emission scenario RCP6.0 found by Réveillet et al (2015), highlighting the uncertainty in future projections of glacier loss associated with different methodologies, input parameters and assumptions concerning the different climate scenarios.…”
Section: Hydrologic (Water Supply-side) Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, this approach neglects any potential future changes in snowfall, which could also affect glacier mass balance. Given the general consensus of a future decrease in precipitation, as portrayed in Urrutia and Vuille (2009), Minvielle and Garreaud (2011) and more recently confirmed by Neukom et al (2015), these projections by Réveillet et al (2015) also have to be considered conservative estimates.…”
Section: Glaciologic Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A variety of recent studies exist for individual glaciers (e.g. Le Meur and Vincent, 2003;Jouvet et al, 2009Jouvet et al, , 2011Aðalgeirsdóttir et al, 2011;Duan et al, 2012;Zekollari et al, 2013Zekollari et al, , 2014Hannesdóttir et al, 2015;Réveillet et al, 2015), but for ice caps such detailed studies are limited (Aðalgeirsdóttir et al, 2005(Aðalgeirsdóttir et al, , 2006Flowers et al, 2005Flowers et al, , 2007Flowers et al, , 2008 Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%